Nathaniel G.N. Milton
- Molecular Biology
- Physiology top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Edward W. HillhouseE. W. HillhouseJ. Robin HarrisDimitris GrammatopoulosH.W.P. QuarteroPatsy CoskeranJanet TreasureA. S. Milton
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (17 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers)Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyFrance
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel G.N. Milton
42 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Molecular Biology 466
- Physiology 349
- Behavioral Neuroscience 222
- Pharmacology 202
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 191
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel G.N. Milton
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel G.N. Milton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel G.N. Milton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel G.N. Milton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel G.N. Milton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel G.N. Milton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel G.N. Milton. The network helps show where Nathaniel G.N. Milton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel G.N. Milton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel G.N. Milton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel G.N. Milton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel G.N. Milton. Nathaniel G.N. Milton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 119 | |
| 9 | 100 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 55 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 44 | |
| 20 | 67 |
About Nathaniel G.N. Milton
Nathaniel G.N. Milton is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Physiology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (17 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (9 papers) and Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (222 citations), Biological Psychiatry (70 citations) and Physiology (349 citations). Nathaniel G.N. Milton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Edward W. Hillhouse, E. W. Hillhouse, J. Robin Harris, Dimitris Grammatopoulos, H.W.P. Quartero, Patsy Coskeran, Janet Treasure, A. S. Milton, David S. Latchman and Jean‐Pierre Changeux. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.