Nathaniel G. Harnett

2.0k citations
60 papers · 956 indexed · h-index 19

Nathaniel G. Harnett

53 papers receiving 946 citations

Peers

Nathaniel G. Harnett
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 281
  • Biological Psychiatry 56
  • Clinical Psychology 387
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 263
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
Replace Arash Javanbakht with:
Arash Javanbakht United States
Jan Christopher Cwik Germany
Sabra S. Inslicht United States
Antonia V. Seligowski United States
Justine Phifer United States
Marc D. Rudolph United States
Elizabeth E. Van Voorhees United States
Weihui Li China
Hilary A. Marusak United States
Titia Hompes Belgium
Nathaniel G. Harnett relative to Arash Javanbakht United States Arash Javanbakht's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Arash Javanbakht · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel G. Harnett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel G. Harnett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel G. Harnett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel G. Harnett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel G. Harnett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel G. Harnett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel G. Harnett. The network helps show where Nathaniel G. Harnett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathaniel G. Harnett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathaniel G. Harnett Line = papers co-authored together Nathaniel G. Harnett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20246
2 20243
3 20240
4 20240
5 20242
6 202411
7 202317
8 20236
9 20230
10 202212
11 20222
12 20212
13 202134
14 20218
15 202016
16 202018
17 201955
18 201817
19 201825
20 201826

About Nathaniel G. Harnett

Nathaniel G. Harnett is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 956 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (22 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (15 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (14 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (281 citations), Biological Psychiatry (56 citations) and Clinical Psychology (387 citations). Nathaniel G. Harnett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David C. Knight, Adam M. Goodman, Muriah D. Wheelock, Kerry J. Ressler, Sylvie Mrug, Kimberly H. Wood, Douglas A. Granger, Sierra Carter, Negar Fani and Bekh Bradley. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychopharmacology, Biological Psychiatry, Biological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, Neuroscience and Behavioral Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026