Adam M. Goodman
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- David C. KnightNathaniel G. HarnettJerzy P. SzaflarskiSylvie MrugMuriah D. WheelockJane B. AllendorferMichael N. DretschJeffrey S. Katz
- Topics
- Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (15 papers)Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (14 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeuroImage
- Partner nations
- United StatesIndiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Adam M. Goodman
50 papers receiving 817 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cognitive Neuroscience 304
- Psychiatry and Mental health 235
- Clinical Psychology 178
- Behavioral Neuroscience 162
- Epidemiology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Adam M. Goodman
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam M. Goodman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam M. Goodman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam M. Goodman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam M. Goodman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam M. Goodman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam M. Goodman. The network helps show where Adam M. Goodman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam M. Goodman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam M. Goodman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam M. Goodman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam M. Goodman. Adam M. Goodman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 32 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 55 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Adam M. Goodman
Adam M. Goodman is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 51 papers that have together received 824 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (15 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (15 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (162 citations), Biological Psychiatry (46 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (304 citations). Adam M. Goodman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David C. Knight, Nathaniel G. Harnett, Jerzy P. Szaflarski, Sylvie Mrug, Muriah D. Wheelock, Jane B. Allendorfer, Michael N. Dretsch, Jeffrey S. Katz, Kimberly H. Wood and W. Curt LaFrance. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.