Nathan W. Bower
Impact in
- Archeology top 10%
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Paleontology top 10%
- Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Papers in
- Archeology 19
- Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis 12
- Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies 4
- Co-authors
- J. D. IngleErnest S. GladneyRichard StoreyCraig C. LundstromKlemens J. HertelMarc A. SnyderStephen R. GettyGreg A. Valentine
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (5 papers)Applied Spectroscopy (4 papers)Journal of Field Archaeology (4 papers)Economic Botany (2 papers)Environmental Entomology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaGuatemala
In The Last Decade
Nathan W. Bower
57 papers receiving 501 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Archeology 14
- Paleontology 97
- Archeology 112
- Analytical Chemistry 102
- Radiation 58
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan W. Bower
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan W. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan W. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan W. Bower more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan W. Bower
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan W. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan W. Bower. The network helps show where Nathan W. Bower may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan W. Bower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 8 | Geobotany of the Niobrara chalk barrens in Colorado: a study of edaphic endemism | 2003 | 10 |
| 9 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1992 | 6 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 14 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1982 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1975 | 4 |
About Nathan W. Bower
Nathan W. Bower is a scholar working on Archeology, Space and Planetary Science, Paleontology, Conservation and Fuel Technology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (12 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (11 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (10 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (5 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (14 citations), Paleontology (97 citations), Archeology (112 citations), Analytical Chemistry (102 citations) and Radiation (58 citations). Nathan W. Bower has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include J. D. Ingle, Ernest S. Gladney, Richard Storey, Craig C. Lundstrom, Klemens J. Hertel, Marc A. Snyder, Stephen R. Getty, Greg A. Valentine, Michael S. Epstein and Kenneth W.W. Sims. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Applied Spectroscopy, Journal of Field Archaeology, Economic Botany and Environmental Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.