Nathan W. Bower

771 citations
59 papers · 585 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

  • Archeology top 10%
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Paleontology top 10%
    • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies

Papers in

Nathan W. Bower

57 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Nathan W. Bower
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Archeology 14
  • Paleontology 97
  • Archeology 112
  • Analytical Chemistry 102
  • Radiation 58
Replace I. Kuleff with:
I. Kuleff Bulgaria
John D. Greenough Canada
Patrick Galler Austria
Monica Gulmini Italy
M. D’Elia Italy
Ian S. Begley United Kingdom
J.R. Vogt United States
H. Stray Norway
Fanny Claverie France
Bernard Médina France
Nathan W. Bower relative to I. Kuleff Bulgaria I. Kuleff's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
I. Kuleff · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan W. Bower

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan W. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan W. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan W. Bower more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan W. Bower

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan W. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan W. Bower. The network helps show where Nathan W. Bower may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan W. Bower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan W. Bower Line = papers co-authored together Nathan W. Bower links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20207
2 201629
3 20091
4 200812
5 20074
6 200621
7 20043
8
Geobotany of the Niobrara chalk barrens in Colorado: a study of edaphic endemism
200310
9 20011
10 19946
11 19928
12 19926
13 198913
14 19874
15 198614
16 19865
17 19834
18 19825
19 198115
20 19754

About Nathan W. Bower

Nathan W. Bower is a scholar working on Archeology, Space and Planetary Science, Paleontology, Conservation and Fuel Technology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (12 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (11 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (10 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (5 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (5 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (4 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (14 citations), Paleontology (97 citations), Archeology (112 citations), Analytical Chemistry (102 citations) and Radiation (58 citations). Nathan W. Bower has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include J. D. Ingle, Ernest S. Gladney, Richard Storey, Craig C. Lundstrom, Klemens J. Hertel, Marc A. Snyder, Stephen R. Getty, Greg A. Valentine, Michael S. Epstein and Kenneth W.W. Sims. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, Applied Spectroscopy, Journal of Field Archaeology, Economic Botany and Environmental Entomology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026