Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel

51.2k total citations
27 papers, 904 citations indexed

About

Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Oceanography and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 904 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 6 papers in Oceanography and 5 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (27 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (15 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (14 papers). Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (27 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (15 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (14 papers). Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel's co-authors include B. J. Owen, Wolfgang Tichy, Tim Dietrich, Reetika Dudi, W. Del Pozzo, S. Khan, A. Samajdar, P. Ajith, Bernd Brügmann and C. Mishra and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Physical review. D and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

In The Last Decade

Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel

25 papers receiving 876 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel United States 15 882 200 194 145 63 27 904
M. Favata United States 14 1.1k 1.3× 160 0.8× 251 1.3× 127 0.9× 56 0.9× 21 1.1k
M. Haney Switzerland 13 936 1.1× 181 0.9× 182 0.9× 123 0.8× 55 0.9× 21 951
Jonathan Blackman United States 11 917 1.0× 173 0.9× 228 1.2× 89 0.6× 78 1.2× 16 940
A. Gopakumar India 22 1.3k 1.5× 173 0.9× 423 2.2× 140 1.0× 56 0.9× 40 1.3k
Nils Dorband Germany 7 1.2k 1.4× 185 0.9× 312 1.6× 140 1.0× 112 1.8× 7 1.3k
R. Cotesta United States 14 1.1k 1.2× 153 0.8× 375 1.9× 83 0.6× 60 1.0× 18 1.1k
M Hannam Germany 4 1.2k 1.4× 197 1.0× 263 1.4× 152 1.0× 121 1.9× 5 1.2k
Luisa T. Buchman United States 12 991 1.1× 127 0.6× 342 1.8× 73 0.5× 95 1.5× 19 1.0k
Robert Owen United States 14 792 0.9× 103 0.5× 353 1.8× 67 0.5× 64 1.0× 19 822
J. Calderón Bustillo Spain 17 854 1.0× 122 0.6× 182 0.9× 60 0.4× 62 1.0× 33 880

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel. The network helps show where Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel. Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Colleoni, M., et al.. (2025). New gravitational waveform model for precessing binary neutron stars with double-spin effects. Physical review. D. 111(6). 5 indexed citations
2.
3.
Wright, M., Justin Janquart, & Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel. (2025). Effect of Deviations from General Relativity on Searches for Gravitational-wave Microlensing and Type II Strong Lensing. The Astrophysical Journal. 981(2). 133–133. 3 indexed citations
4.
5.
Kulkarni, Sumeet, Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel, K. S. Phukon, N. V. Krishnendu, & Anuradha Gupta. (2024). Inferring spin tilts of binary black holes at formation with plus-era gravitational wave detectors. Physical review. D. 109(4). 4 indexed citations
6.
Narayan, P., Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel, & Anuradha Gupta. (2023). Effect of ignoring eccentricity in testing general relativity with gravitational waves. Physical review. D. 108(6). 29 indexed citations
7.
Johnson-McDaniel, Nathan K., Abhirup Ghosh, S. Ghonge, et al.. (2022). Investigating the relation between gravitational wave tests of general relativity. Physical review. D. 105(4). 17 indexed citations
8.
Carullo, G., D. Laghi, Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel, et al.. (2022). Constraints on Kerr-Newman black holes from merger-ringdown gravitational-wave observations. Physical review. D. 105(6). 45 indexed citations
9.
Johnson-McDaniel, Nathan K., et al.. (2020). Distinguishing high-mass binary neutron stars from binary black holes with second- and third-generation gravitational wave observatories. Physical review. D. 101(10). 25 indexed citations
10.
Johnson-McDaniel, Nathan K., et al.. (2020). Constraining black hole mimickers with gravitational wave observations. Physical review. D. 102(12). 34 indexed citations
11.
Dietrich, Tim, A. Samajdar, S. Khan, et al.. (2019). Improving the NRTidal model for binary neutron star systems. Physical review. D. 100(4). 165 indexed citations
12.
Mehta, A. K., et al.. (2019). Including mode mixing in a higher-multipole model for gravitational waveforms from nonspinning black-hole binaries. Physical review. D. 100(2). 18 indexed citations
13.
Minazzoli, O., Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel, & Mairi Sakellariadou. (2019). Shortcomings of Shapiro delay-based tests of the equivalence principle on cosmological scales. Physical review. D. 100(10). 14 indexed citations
14.
Ghosh, Abhirup, Archisman Ghosh, Nathan K. Johnson-McDaniel, et al.. (2016). Testing general relativity using golden black-hole binaries. Physical review. D. 94(2). 95 indexed citations
15.
Johnson-McDaniel, Nathan K., Abhay Shah, & B. F. Whiting. (2015). Experimental mathematics meets gravitational self-force. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 92(4). 29 indexed citations
16.
Markakis, C., et al.. (2014). Initial data for binary neutron stars with adjustable eccentricity. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(8). 24 indexed citations
17.
Johnson-McDaniel, Nathan K.. (2014). Taming the post-Newtonian expansion: Simplifying the modes of the gravitational wave energy flux at infinity for a point particle in a circular orbit around a Schwarzschild black hole. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(2). 12 indexed citations
18.
Johnson-McDaniel, Nathan K. & B. J. Owen. (2013). Maximum elastic deformations of relativistic stars. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(4). 111 indexed citations
19.
Johnson-McDaniel, Nathan K.. (2013). Gravitational wave constraints on the shape of neutron stars. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(4). 5 indexed citations
20.
Johnson-McDaniel, Nathan K. & B. J. Owen. (2012). Shear modulus of the hadron-quark mixed phase. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(6). 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Favata Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Haney Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jonathan Blackman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Gopakumar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nils Dorband Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Cotesta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M Hannam Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Luisa T. Buchman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Owen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Calderón Bustillo
Rankless by CCL
2026