K. Wette

90.0k total citations
31 papers, 643 citations indexed

About

K. Wette is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Geophysics and Oceanography. According to data from OpenAlex, K. Wette has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 643 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 11 papers in Geophysics and 6 papers in Oceanography. Recurrent topics in K. Wette's work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (31 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (6 papers). K. Wette is often cited by papers focused on Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (31 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (11 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (6 papers). K. Wette collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Germany and United States. K. Wette's co-authors include R. Prix, Christoph Dreißigacker, A. Melatos, M. A. Papa, B. Krishnan, T. Dent, K. Wiesner, A. P. Lundgren, A. B. Nielsen and A. Miller and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Physical review. D and Classical and Quantum Gravity.

In The Last Decade

K. Wette

30 papers receiving 624 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
K. Wette Australia 15 619 179 171 71 66 31 643
M. Drago Italy 13 662 1.1× 185 1.0× 87 0.5× 66 0.9× 95 1.4× 28 680
P. Leaci Italy 13 512 0.8× 133 0.7× 131 0.8× 61 0.9× 127 1.9× 36 547
M. Millhouse United States 11 421 0.7× 153 0.9× 103 0.6× 25 0.4× 46 0.7× 16 433
C. Palomba Italy 17 783 1.3× 185 1.0× 223 1.3× 96 1.4× 194 2.9× 55 840
O. J. Piccinni Italy 12 422 0.7× 78 0.4× 87 0.5× 45 0.6× 137 2.1× 29 447
T. Dal Canton United States 14 715 1.2× 116 0.6× 80 0.5× 55 0.8× 117 1.8× 26 748
T. D. Abbott United States 5 650 1.1× 113 0.6× 82 0.5× 28 0.4× 145 2.2× 9 691
M. Pitkin United Kingdom 11 381 0.6× 91 0.5× 100 0.6× 30 0.4× 70 1.1× 27 387
K. Ackley United States 9 582 0.9× 109 0.6× 60 0.4× 28 0.4× 108 1.6× 17 596
A. M. Sintes Spain 15 990 1.6× 190 1.1× 167 1.0× 44 0.6× 217 3.3× 37 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by K. Wette

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of K. Wette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Wette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Wette more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by K. Wette

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Wette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Wette. The network helps show where K. Wette may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Wette

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Wette. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Wette based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with K. Wette. K. Wette is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones, D. H., Nils Siemonsen, L. Sun, et al.. (2025). Methodology for constraining ultralight vector bosons with gravitational wave searches targeting merger remnant black holes. Physical review. D. 111(6). 4 indexed citations
2.
Grace, B., K. Wette, & S. M. Scott. (2024). Gravitational wave searches for postmerger remnants of GW170817 and GW190425. Physical review. D. 110(8). 3 indexed citations
3.
Jones, D. H., L. Sun, Nils Siemonsen, et al.. (2023). Methods and prospects for gravitational-wave searches targeting ultralight vector-boson clouds around known black holes. Physical review. D. 108(6). 17 indexed citations
4.
Wette, K., et al.. (2023). Inferring neutron star properties with continuous gravitational waves. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 521(2). 2103–2113. 8 indexed citations
5.
Grace, B., K. Wette, S. M. Scott, & L. Sun. (2023). Piecewise frequency model for searches for long-transient gravitational waves from young neutron stars. Physical review. D. 108(12). 6 indexed citations
6.
Wette, K., et al.. (2023). Population synthesis and parameter estimation of neutron stars with continuous gravitational waves and third-generation detectors. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 527(4). 10564–10574. 1 indexed citations
7.
Prix, R., et al.. (2023). Implementation of a new weave-based search pipeline for continuous gravitational waves from known binary systems. Physical review. D. 107(6). 3 indexed citations
8.
Chu, Qi, M. Kovalam, L. Wen, et al.. (2022). SPIIR online coherent pipeline to search for gravitational waves from compact binary coalescences. Physical review. D. 105(2). 51 indexed citations
9.
Wagner, K. J., J. T. Whelan, J. K. Wofford, & K. Wette. (2022). Template lattices for a cross-correlation search for gravitational waves from Scorpius X-1. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 39(7). 75013–75013. 10 indexed citations
10.
Galaudage, S., K. Wette, D. K. Galloway, & C. Messenger. (2021). Deep searches for X-ray pulsations from Scorpius X-1 and Cygnus X-2 in support of continuous gravitational wave searches. arXiv (Cornell University). 8 indexed citations
11.
Wette, K., et al.. (2021). Deep exploration for continuous gravitational waves at 171–172 Hz in LIGO second observing run data. Physical review. D. 103(8). 14 indexed citations
12.
Wette, K., et al.. (2019). Optimizing the choice of analysis method for all-sky searches for continuous gravitational waves with Einstein@Home. Physical review. D. 99(8). 13 indexed citations
13.
Wette, K., R. Prix, D. Keitel, et al.. (2018). OctApps: a library of Octave functions for continuous gravitational-wave data analysis. The Journal of Open Source Software. 3(26). 707–707. 12 indexed citations
14.
Wette, K., S. Walsh, R. Prix, & M. A. Papa. (2018). Weave: a semicoherent search implementation for continuous gravitational waves. arXiv (Cornell University). 2 indexed citations
15.
Zhu, S. J., M. A. Papa, H.-B. Eggenstein, et al.. (2016). Einstein@Home search for continuous gravitational waves from Cassiopeia A. Physical review. D. 94(8). 19 indexed citations
16.
Canton, T. Dal, A. Nitz, A. P. Lundgren, et al.. (2014). Implementing a search for aligned-spin neutron star-black hole systems with advanced ground based gravitational wave detectors. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(8). 117 indexed citations
17.
Wette, K.. (2014). Lattice template placement for coherent all-sky searches for gravitational-wave pulsars. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(12). 32 indexed citations
18.
Wette, K.. (2012). Estimating the sensitivity of wide-parameter-space searches for gravitational-wave pulsars. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(4). 48 indexed citations
19.
Mendell, G. & K. Wette. (2008). Using generalized PowerFlux methods to estimate the parameters of periodic gravitational waves. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 25(11). 114044–114044. 3 indexed citations
20.
Wette, K., et al.. (2005). An analysis pipeline for correlated global environmental noise. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 22(18). S1079–S1086.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026