Nathan Charles Weed
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- James N. ButcherKyunghee HanYossef S. Ben‐PorathStuart W. QuirkMichael HoergerStephen M. ColarelliKenneth J. SufkaChristina L. Williams
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers)Psychological Testing and Assessment (8 papers)Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nathan Charles Weed
45 papers receiving 632 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Clinical Psychology 325
- Social Psychology 150
- Applied Psychology 148
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 135
- Epidemiology 118
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Charles Weed
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Charles Weed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Charles Weed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Charles Weed more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Charles Weed
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Charles Weed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Charles Weed. The network helps show where Nathan Charles Weed may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Charles Weed
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Charles Weed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Charles Weed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Charles Weed. Nathan Charles Weed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 103 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Hurricane Katrina's impact on infectious disease surveillance. | 3 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 119 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Nathan Charles Weed
Nathan Charles Weed is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (8 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (148 citations), Clinical Psychology (325 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (135 citations). Nathan Charles Weed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James N. Butcher, Kyunghee Han, Yossef S. Ben‐Porath, Stuart W. Quirk, Michael Hoerger, Stephen M. Colarelli, Kenneth J. Sufka, Christina L. Williams, Mark S. Aloia and Carolyn L. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Psychological Assessment and Physiology & Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.