Nathan Charles Weed

1.0k citations
47 papers · 688 indexed · h-index 13

Nathan Charles Weed

45 papers receiving 632 citations

Peers

Nathan Charles Weed
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Applied Psychology 148
  • Clinical Psychology 325
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 135
  • Social Psychology 150
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 67
Replace Jennifer E. Irvin with:
Jennifer E. Irvin United States
Michael Gräf Germany
Michael G. Ainette United States
Richard M. Nicki Canada
Nicolas Kambouropoulos Australia
Chelsie M. Young United States
Anna M. Bardone United States
Kristen L. Lavallee Germany
Alison A. Papadakis United States
Larry H. Strasburger United States
Nathan Charles Weed relative to Jennifer E. Irvin United States Jennifer E. Irvin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Jennifer E. Irvin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Charles Weed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Charles Weed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Charles Weed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Charles Weed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Charles Weed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Charles Weed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Charles Weed. The network helps show where Nathan Charles Weed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Charles Weed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Charles Weed Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Charles Weed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20204
3 20143
4 20133
5 201211
6 2011103
7 20103
8 20087
9
Hurricane Katrina's impact on infectious disease surveillance.
20063
10 20044
11 20005
12 199817
13 19988
14 199819
15 19968
16 199539
17 199434
18 1992119
19 199223
20 19903

About Nathan Charles Weed

Nathan Charles Weed is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 47 papers that have together received 688 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (8 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (7 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (148 citations), Clinical Psychology (325 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (135 citations). Nathan Charles Weed has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James N. Butcher, Kyunghee Han, Yossef S. Ben‐Porath, Stuart W. Quirk, Michael Hoerger, Stephen M. Colarelli, Kenneth J. Sufka, Christina L. Williams, Mark S. Aloia and Carolyn L. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality Assessment, Psychological Assessment, Journal of Clinical Psychology, Assessment and Violence Against Women.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026