Chelsie M. Young

939 total citations
43 papers, 660 citations indexed

About

Chelsie M. Young is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Chelsie M. Young has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 660 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Epidemiology, 23 papers in Applied Psychology and 13 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Chelsie M. Young's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (26 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (23 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). Chelsie M. Young is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (26 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (23 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). Chelsie M. Young collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and United Kingdom. Chelsie M. Young's co-authors include Clayton Neighbors, Craig E. Henderson, Jennifer L. Bryan, J. Leigh Leasure, Michelle C. Quist, Angelo M. DiBello, Dawn W. Foster, Lindsey M. Rodriguez, Mai‐Ly N. Steers and Catherine A. Forestell and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Chelsie M. Young

43 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers

Chelsie M. Young
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Epidemiology 247
  • Applied Psychology 210
  • Clinical Psychology 188
  • General Health Professions 133
  • Social Psychology 116
Jasmina Burdzovic Andreas Norway
Evelien A. P. Poelen Netherlands
Cathy Lau‐Barraco United States
Patricia C. Rutledge United States
Samuel F. Acuff United States
Jennifer E. Irvin United States
Viktoriya Magid United States
Alexandra M. Mellis United States
Michael Dunne Australia
Elizabeth K. Reynolds United States
Jasmina Burdzovic Andreas Norway View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Chelsie M. Young
Chelsie M. Young · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Chelsie M. Young
Chelsie M. Young · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Chelsie M. Young

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chelsie M. Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chelsie M. Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chelsie M. Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chelsie M. Young

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chelsie M. Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chelsie M. Young. The network helps show where Chelsie M. Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chelsie M. Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chelsie M. Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chelsie M. Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chelsie M. Young. Chelsie M. Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 6
3 2
4 4
5 1
6 16
7 7
8 8
9 40
10 16
11 10
12 107
13 16
14 1
15 20
16 20
17 12
18 11
19 23
20 28

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026