Nathan Bradshaw
Impact in
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Papers in
-
- Uterine Myomas and Treatments 2
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments 1
-
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 2
- Co-authors
- James R. Burrell (2 shared papers)John R. Hodges (2 shared papers)Olivier Piguet (2 shared papers)David Foxe (2 shared papers)Aurélie L. Manuel (1 shared paper)Nicholas J. Cordato (1 shared paper)Muireann Irish (1 shared paper)Daniel Roquet (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Gynecologic Oncology (3 papers)Cortex (1 paper)Health Expectations (1 paper)The Lancet Oncology (1 paper)Journal of Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Nathan Bradshaw
6 papers receiving 220 citations
Nathan Bradshaw's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 115
- Reproductive Medicine 47
- Psychiatry and Mental health 15
- Cognitive Neuroscience 20
- Epidemiology 31
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Bradshaw
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Bradshaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Bradshaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Bradshaw more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Bradshaw
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Bradshaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Bradshaw. The network helps show where Nathan Bradshaw may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Bradshaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiotherapy as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer versus chemoradiotherapy alone (OUTBACK): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 127 |
| 2 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2026 | 0 |
About Nathan Bradshaw
Nathan Bradshaw is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 220 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (1 paper), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (115 citations), Reproductive Medicine (47 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (15 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (20 citations) and Epidemiology (31 citations). Nathan Bradshaw has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include James R. Burrell, John R. Hodges, Olivier Piguet, David Foxe, Aurélie L. Manuel, Nicholas J. Cordato, Muireann Irish, Daniel Roquet, Christopher Steer and Rosemary Lord. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, Cortex, Health Expectations, The Lancet Oncology and Journal of Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.