Nathalie Giger
- Political Science and International Relations top 0.5%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Moira NelsonJan RossetJulian BernauerZoe LefkofridiKlaus ArmingeonHeike KlüverCatherine E. De VriesGijs Schumacher
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (36 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (25 papers)Gender Politics and Representation (23 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Political ScienceComparative Political StudiesBritish Journal of Political Science
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Nathalie Giger
49 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Political Science and International Relations 1.2k
- Gender Studies 432
- Sociology and Political Science 263
- Strategy and Management 259
- Economics and Econometrics 206
Countries citing papers authored by Nathalie Giger
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathalie Giger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathalie Giger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathalie Giger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathalie Giger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathalie Giger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathalie Giger. The network helps show where Nathalie Giger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathalie Giger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathalie Giger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathalie Giger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathalie Giger. Nathalie Giger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | Introducing the inequality and politics survey: preliminary findings | 5 |
| 8 | What rich and poor consider important and how this matters for representation | 3 |
| 9 | Growing income inequality, growing legitimacy: a longitudinal approach to perceptions of inequality | 5 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 64 | |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 154 | |
| 19 | 84 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Nathalie Giger
Nathalie Giger is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (36 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (25 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (1.2k citations), Gender Studies (432 citations) and Public Administration (77 citations). Nathalie Giger has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Moira Nelson, Jan Rosset, Julian Bernauer, Zoe Lefkofridi, Klaus Armingeon, Heike Klüver, Catherine E. De Vries, Gijs Schumacher, Thomas Bräuninger and Denise Traber. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, Comparative Political Studies and British Journal of Political Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.