Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective
2009322 citationsFrank R. Baumgartner, Christian Breunig et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christian Breunig
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christian Breunig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christian Breunig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christian Breunig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christian Breunig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christian Breunig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christian Breunig. The network helps show where Christian Breunig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christian Breunig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christian Breunig.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christian Breunig based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christian Breunig. Christian Breunig is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sevenans, Julie, et al.. (2024). Are poor people poorly heard?. European Journal of Political Research. 64(3). 1326–1350.1 indexed citations
Traber, Denise, et al.. (2019). What rich and poor consider important and how this matters for representation. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva).3 indexed citations
9.
Baumgartner, Frank R., Christian Breunig, & Emiliano Grossman. (2019). Comparative Policy Agendas. KOPS (University of Konstanz).75 indexed citations
Breunig, Christian & Achim Goerres. (2011). Searching for Electoral Irregularities in an Established Democracy: Applying Benford’s Law Tests to Bundestag Elections in Unified Germany. Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln).1 indexed citations
16.
Breunig, Christian & Samuel Workman. (2010). Navigating the Dimensions of Policy Agendas. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Brouard, Sylvain, John Wilkerson, Frank R. Baumgartner, et al.. (2009). Comparing Legislative Production: Issues and Methods. Revue internationale de politique comparée. 16(3). 381–404.3 indexed citations
Breunig, Christian. (1994). Kommunikationsfreiheiten : ein internationaler Vergleich.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.