Natasha Penner

18 papers receiving 395 citations

Peers

Natasha Penner
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 124
  • Analytical Chemistry 49
  • Neurology 70
  • Spectroscopy 74
  • Bioengineering 21
Replace Bin Qi with:
Bin Qi China
Tingting Xiong China
Ying Shen China
Xingwen Wang China
Zhao Li China
W. Beyer Germany
Zhiyue Li China
Qiaojuan Zhang United States
Jasmina Nikolić Serbia
Natasha Penner relative to Bin Qi China Bin Qi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Bin Qi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Penner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Penner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Penner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Penner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Penner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Penner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Penner. The network helps show where Natasha Penner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha Penner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha Penner Line = papers co-authored together Natasha Penner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999101
2 201983
3 201843
4 201943
5 200137
6 201817
7 199917
8 200317
9 201911
10 202011
11 20177
12 20246
13 20186
14 20222
15 20232
16 20241
17 20231
18 20241
19 20250
20 20250

About Natasha Penner

Natasha Penner is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 21 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (2 papers) and Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (124 citations), Analytical Chemistry (49 citations), Neurology (70 citations), Spectroscopy (74 citations) and Bioengineering (21 citations). Natasha Penner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Pavel N. Nesterenko, В. А. Даванков, M. P. Tsyurupa, Mikhail M. Ilyin, Tobias Sejbæk, Zsolt Illés, Jason P. Mendoza, Tatiana Plavina, Nellie Anne Martin and Mads Ravnborg. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Neurology, CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Chromatographia and Advances in Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact