Natasha Myers

2.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 911 citations indexed

About

Natasha Myers is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Geography, Planning and Development. According to data from OpenAlex, Natasha Myers has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 911 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cultural Studies, 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 4 papers in Geography, Planning and Development. Recurrent topics in Natasha Myers's work include Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (6 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers) and Science Education and Perceptions (4 papers). Natasha Myers is often cited by papers focused on Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (6 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers) and Science Education and Perceptions (4 papers). Natasha Myers collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Australia and France. Natasha Myers's co-authors include Aryn Martin, Ana Viseu, Carla Christina Hustak, Elizabeth Parker, Trish Gould, Victor B. Shelburne, Sarah E. Truman, Arnika Peselmann, Stephanie Springgay and Natalie Loveless and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Studies of Science, Higher Education Research & Development and Body & Society.

In The Last Decade

Natasha Myers

19 papers receiving 795 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories sort by overperformance

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

The politics of care in technoscience

2015 324 citations Aryn Martin, Natasha Myers et al. Social Studies of Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Natasha Myers Canada	11	248	228	94	79	74	20	911
Tim Ingold United Kingdom	4	261 1.1×	257 1.1×	58 0.6×	92 1.2×	77 1.0×	8	718
Banbapuy Ganambarr Australia	13	333 1.3×	299 1.3×	102 1.1×	46 0.6×	118 1.6×	20	835
Bawaka Country Australia	9	320 1.3×	288 1.3×	89 0.9×	44 0.6×	108 1.5×	14	798
Ritjilili Ganambarr Australia	13	330 1.3×	298 1.3×	101 1.1×	46 0.6×	118 1.6×	20	832
Djawundil Maymuru Australia	13	330 1.3×	298 1.3×	101 1.1×	46 0.6×	118 1.6×	20	832
Merrkiyawuy Ganambarr‐Stubbs Australia	9	284 1.1×	245 1.1×	82 0.9×	40 0.5×	105 1.4×	14	709
Deborah Dixon United Kingdom	19	456 1.8×	451 2.0×	123 1.3×	78 1.0×	60 0.8×	60	1.1k
Tove Pettersen Norway	7	254 1.0×	491 2.2×	132 1.4×	87 1.1×	63 0.9×	16	1.4k
Stephen Muecke Australia	12	154 0.6×	287 1.3×	116 1.2×	43 0.5×	113 1.5×	71	892
Rebecca Solnit	13	292 1.2×	292 1.3×	91 1.0×	103 1.3×	50 0.7×	27	890

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Myers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Myers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Myers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Myers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Myers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Myers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Myers. The network helps show where Natasha Myers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Myers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Myers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Myers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Myers. Natasha Myers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Myers, Natasha, et al.. (2023). "Stories are seeds. We need to learn how to sow other stories about plants.". 10(2). 266–276.

Myers, Natasha, et al.. (2021). À propos du Ravissement de Darwin . Entretien Natasha Myers – Dusan Kazic. N° 6(2). 70–76. 1 indexed citations

Truman, Sarah E., Natalie Loveless, Erin Manning, Natasha Myers, & Stephanie Springgay. (2020). The Intimacies of Doing Research-Creation: Sarah E. Truman in Conversation with Natalie Loveless, Erin Manning, Natasha Myers, and Stephanie Springgay. 1 indexed citations

Myers, Natasha. (2017). Ungrid-able Ecologies: Decolonizing the Ecological Sensorium in a 10,000 year-old NaturalCultural Happening. 3(2). 1–24. 8 indexed citations

Myers, Natasha. (2017). Ungrid-able Ecologies: Decolonizing the Ecological Sensorium in a 10,000 year-old NaturalCultural Happening. Catalyst Feminism Theory Technoscience. 3(2). 1–24. 17 indexed citations

Myers, Natasha. (2017). From the anthropocene to the planthroposcene: Designing gardens for plant/people involution. History and Anthropology. 28(3). 297–301. 68 indexed citations

Myers, Natasha. (2015). Amplifying the gaps between climate science and forest policy: the Write2Know Project and participatory dissent. 1 indexed citations

Myers, Natasha. (2015). Conversations on Plant Sensing : Notes From the Field. Nature and Culture. 3. 35–66. 58 indexed citations

Myers, Natasha. (2015). Rendering Life Molecular. 10 indexed citations

10.

Martin, Aryn, Natasha Myers, & Ana Viseu. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science. 45(5). 625–641. 324 indexed citations breakdown →

11.

Myers, Natasha. (2015). Rendering Life Molecular. 73 indexed citations

12.

Myers, Natasha, et al.. (2013). Providing 'best practice' placements begins with mentoring skills : overview of the Program of Experience in the Palliative Approach (PEPA) quality improvement initiatives for mentors. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 1 indexed citations

13.

Myers, Natasha. (2012). Dance Your PhD: Embodied Animations, Body Experiments, and the Affective Entanglements of Life Science Research. Body & Society. 18(1). 151–189. 27 indexed citations

14.

Hustak, Carla Christina & Natasha Myers. (2012). Involutionary Momentum: Affective Ecologies and the Sciences of Plant/Insect Encounters. differences. 23(3). 74–118. 140 indexed citations

15.

Myers, Natasha. (2010). Pedagogy and Performativity: Rendering Laboratory Lives in the DocumentaryNaturally Obsessed: The Making of a Scientist. Isis. 101(4). 817–828. 9 indexed citations

16.

Parker, Elizabeth, et al.. (2009). More than experiential learning or volunteering: a case study of community service learning within the Australian context. Higher Education Research & Development. 28(6). 585–596. 39 indexed citations

17.

Myers, Natasha. (2009). Conjuring Machinic Life. 2(1). 2 indexed citations

18.

Myers, Natasha. (2008). Molecular Embodiments and the Body-work of Modeling in Protein Crystallography. Social Studies of Science. 38(2). 163–199. 106 indexed citations

19.

Myers, Natasha. (2006). Animating Mechanism. Science & Technology Studies. 19(2). 6–30. 10 indexed citations

20.

Myers, Natasha, et al.. (2000). Ecological land classification in the high rainfall belt of the southern Appalachian mountains.. Castanea. 65(4). 258–272. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact