Natasha Myers
- Geography, Planning and Development top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Cultural Studies top 2%
- Social Psychology
- Anthropology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ana ViseuAryn MartinCarla Christina HustakTrish GouldElizabeth ParkerVictor B. ShelburneSarah E. TrumanNatalie Loveless
- Topics
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (6 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers)Science Education and Perceptions (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
Natasha Myers
19 papers receiving 795 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Geography, Planning and Development 248
- Sociology and Political Science 228
- Cultural Studies 94
- Social Psychology 79
- Anthropology 74
Countries citing papers authored by Natasha Myers
This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha Myers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha Myers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha Myers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha Myers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha Myers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha Myers. The network helps show where Natasha Myers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natasha Myers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natasha Myers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natasha Myers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natasha Myers. Natasha Myers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | The Intimacies of Doing Research-Creation: Sarah E. Truman in Conversation with Natalie Loveless, Erin Manning, Natasha Myers, and Stephanie Springgay | 1 |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 68 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 73 | |
| 11 | The politics of care in technosciencebreakdown → | 324 |
| 12 | Providing 'best practice' placements begins with mentoring skills : overview of the Program of Experience in the Palliative Approach (PEPA) quality improvement initiatives for mentors | 1 |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 140 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 39 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 106 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | Ecological land classification in the high rainfall belt of the southern Appalachian mountains. | 16 |
About Natasha Myers
Natasha Myers is a scholar working on Cultural Studies, Geography, Planning and Development and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (6 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers) and Science Education and Perceptions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (248 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (68 citations) and Cultural Studies (94 citations). Natasha Myers has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Croatia. Frequent co-authors include Ana Viseu, Aryn Martin, Carla Christina Hustak, Trish Gould, Elizabeth Parker, Victor B. Shelburne, Sarah E. Truman, Natalie Loveless, Erin Manning and Stephanie Springgay. Their work appears in journals such as Social Studies of Science, Higher Education Research & Development and Body & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.