Natasha M. Agramonte

629 citations
22 papers · 494 indexed · h-index 13

Natasha M. Agramonte

21 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Natasha M. Agramonte
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Insect Science 233
  • Plant Science 341
  • Food Science 149
  • Pharmacology 46
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 117
Replace Maia Tsikolia with:
Maia Tsikolia United States
Sócrates Cabral de Holanda Cavalcanti Brazil
Jonny E. Duque Colombia
Sang‐Guei Lee South Korea
Maurice O. Omolo Kenya
Josiane Somariva Prophiro Brazil
Chan-Sik Jung South Korea
Lalit Mohan India
Rameshwar Singh Rattan India
Arun K. Tripathi India
Natasha M. Agramonte relative to Maia Tsikolia United States Maia Tsikolia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Maia Tsikolia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natasha M. Agramonte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natasha M. Agramonte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natasha M. Agramonte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natasha M. Agramonte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natasha M. Agramonte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natasha M. Agramonte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natasha M. Agramonte. The network helps show where Natasha M. Agramonte may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natasha M. Agramonte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natasha M. Agramonte Line = papers co-authored together Natasha M. Agramonte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20230
2 202012
3 20195
4 201864
5 20187
6 20183
7 201738
8 20165
9 201628
10 20164
11 20162
12 201627
13 201530
14
Composition of the essential oil of Pink Chablis⢠bluebeard (Caryopteris Ãclandonensis 'Durio') and its biological activity against the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti
20152
15 201326
16 201341
17 201325
18 201360
19 201265
20 201222

About Natasha M. Agramonte

Natasha M. Agramonte is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Food Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (13 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (10 papers), Mosquito-borne diseases and control (8 papers), Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (6 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Insect Utilization and Effects (2 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (2 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (233 citations), Plant Science (341 citations) and Food Science (149 citations). Natasha M. Agramonte has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Ulrich R. Bernier, Nurhayat Tabanca, Jeffrey R. Bloomquist, Maia Tsikolia, K. Hüsnü Can Başer, Ikhlas A. Khan, Betül Demırcı, Abbas Alı, Kenneth J. Linthicum and James J. Becnel. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Molecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026