James M. Spiers
- Plant Science top 2%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Blair J. SampsonStephen J. StringerRobert N. TrigianoTimothy A. RinehartMark T. WindhamNurhayat TabancaDavid E. WedgeBetül Demırcı
- Topics
- Berry genetics and cultivation research (72 papers)Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (57 papers)Growth and nutrition in plants (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTürkiyeSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
James M. Spiers
103 papers receiving 962 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Plant Science 842
- Insect Science 202
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 161
- Molecular Biology 153
- Food Science 136
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Spiers
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Spiers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Spiers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Spiers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Spiers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Spiers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Spiers. The network helps show where James M. Spiers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Spiers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Spiers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Spiers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Spiers. James M. Spiers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Foraging behavior, pollinator effectiveness, and management potential of the new world squash bees Peponapis pruinosa and Xenoglossa strenua (Apidae: Eucerini) | 8 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 118 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | Evaluation of techniques for screening of strawberry seedlings for resistance to Colletotrichum fragariae. | 1 |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | Effect of pH level and nitrogen source on elemental leaf content of 'Tiblue' rabbiteye blueberry. | 14 |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About James M. Spiers
James M. Spiers is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Insect Science, having authored 110 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Berry genetics and cultivation research (72 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (57 papers) and Growth and nutrition in plants (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (842 citations), Insect Science (202 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (161 citations). James M. Spiers has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Blair J. Sampson, Stephen J. Stringer, Robert N. Trigiano, Timothy A. Rinehart, Mark T. Windham, Nurhayat Tabanca, David E. Wedge, Betül Demırcı, Arlen D. Draper and K. Hüsnü Can Başer. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Crop Science and Agronomy Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.