Natallia V. Riddick
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sheryl S. MoyViktoriya D. NikolovaLorinda K. BakerMichael A. NaderRandal J. NonnemanPaul W. CzotyKara L. AgsterBrian L. Teng
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers)Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers)Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Natallia V. Riddick
21 papers receiving 838 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Molecular Biology 299
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 261
- Social Psychology 238
- Genetics 226
- Cognitive Neuroscience 210
Countries citing papers authored by Natallia V. Riddick
This map shows the geographic impact of Natallia V. Riddick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natallia V. Riddick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natallia V. Riddick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natallia V. Riddick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natallia V. Riddick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natallia V. Riddick. The network helps show where Natallia V. Riddick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natallia V. Riddick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natallia V. Riddick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natallia V. Riddick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natallia V. Riddick. Natallia V. Riddick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 74 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 53 | |
| 12 | 82 | |
| 13 | 112 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 72 | |
| 18 | 94 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About Natallia V. Riddick
Natallia V. Riddick is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Pharmacy and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 21 papers that have together received 849 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (5 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (123 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (261 citations) and Social Psychology (238 citations). Natallia V. Riddick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Sheryl S. Moy, Viktoriya D. Nikolova, Lorinda K. Baker, Michael A. Nader, Randal J. Nonneman, Paul W. Czoty, Kara L. Agster, Brian L. Teng, Pradeep Garg and Robert W. Gould. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.