Natalie Wray
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 2%
- Nursing education and management
Papers in
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 2
- Interprofessional Education and Collaboration 1
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 3
- Innovations in Medical Education 2
- Co-authors
- Louise McCall (8 shared papers)Lenore Manderson (4 shared papers)Milica Marković (2 shared papers)Lisa McKenna (3 shared papers)Bill Lord (1 shared paper)Michael Quinn (2 shared papers)Claire Palermo (1 shared paper)Neil Boudville (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Advances in Health Sciences Education (2 papers)Qualitative Health Research (1 paper)Medical Education (1 paper)Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (1 paper)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Natalie Wray
16 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Research and Theory 64
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
- Leadership and Management 7
- General Health Professions 101
- Emergency Medical Services 26
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Wray
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Wray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Wray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Wray more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Wray
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Wray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Wray. The network helps show where Natalie Wray may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Wray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 123 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 62 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 46 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 15 | |
| 11 | Placements and Their Influence on Australian Nutrition and Dietetics Students | 2009 | 13 |
| 12 | 2004 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1 |
About Natalie Wray
Natalie Wray is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Oncology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 446 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Data Quality and Management (2 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (64 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations), Leadership and Management (7 citations), General Health Professions (101 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (26 citations). Natalie Wray has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Louise McCall, Lenore Manderson, Milica Marković, Lisa McKenna, Bill Lord, Michael Quinn, Claire Palermo, Neil Boudville, Felicity Flack and Catherine Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Health Sciences Education, Qualitative Health Research, Medical Education, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.