Natalie W. Uhl
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Harold E. MooreJohn DransfieldMadeline M. HarleyWilliam J. BakerCarl E. LewisConny B. AsmussenConny Bruun Asmussen LangeRobin L. Chazdon
- Topics
- Plant Diversity and Evolution (31 papers)Plant and animal studies (15 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesDenmarkUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Natalie W. Uhl
35 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 627
- Plant Science 481
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 189
- Genetics 177
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie W. Uhl
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie W. Uhl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie W. Uhl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie W. Uhl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie W. Uhl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie W. Uhl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie W. Uhl. The network helps show where Natalie W. Uhl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie W. Uhl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie W. Uhl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie W. Uhl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie W. Uhl. Natalie W. Uhl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 181 | |
| 2 | A new phylogenetic classification of the palm family, Arecaceae | 154 |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | Oraniopsis appendiculata, a previously misunderstood Queensland Palm. | 6 |
| 6 | The indigenous palms of New Caledonia | 12 |
| 7 | Halmoorea, a new genus from Madagascar, with notes on Sindroa and Orania | 1 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 73 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | Leaf anatomy in the species of Hyophorbe(Palmae). | 9 |
| 13 | 61 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | The protection of pollen and ovules in palms. | 32 |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | Leaf anatomy in the Chelyocarpus alliance. | 5 |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Natalie W. Uhl
Natalie W. Uhl is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Forestry and Plant Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (31 papers), Plant and animal studies (15 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.2k citations), Forestry (119 citations) and Horticulture (23 citations). Natalie W. Uhl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Denmark and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Harold E. Moore, John Dransfield, Madeline M. Harley, William J. Baker, Carl E. Lewis, Conny B. Asmussen, Conny Bruun Asmussen Lange, Robin L. Chazdon, Mark Wilkinson and Félix Forest. Their work appears in journals such as Systematic Biology, Annals of Botany and American Journal of Botany.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.