Systematic Biology

3.6k papers and 341.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.6k papers published in Systematic Biology in the last decades have received a total of 341.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Systematic Biology usually cover Genetics (1.7k papers), Molecular Biology (1.4k papers) and Paleontology (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Genetic diversity and population structure (1.4k papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (1.2k papers) and Evolution and Paleontology Studies (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Systematic Biology are Olivier Gascuel, Stéphane Guindon, John P. Huelsenbeck, Fredrik Ronquist, Wayne P. Maddison, John J. Wiens, James S. Farris, Marc A. Suchard, Maria Anisimova and Joe Felsenstein.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Systematic Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Systematic Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Systematic Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Systematic Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Systematic Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Systematic Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Systematic Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025