Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.34885/92 →Countries where authors are citing Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms
This map shows the geographic impact of Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms
This network shows the impact of Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms.
About Genera Palmarum - The Evolution and Classification of the Palms
This paper, published in 2008, received 505 indexed citations . Written by John Dransfield, Natalie W. Uhl, Conny B. Asmussen, William J. Baker, Madeline M. Harley and Carl E. Lewis covering the research area of Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (321 citations), Plant Science (162 citations) and Molecular Biology (144 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.34885/92.