Natalie Nardone

33 papers receiving 931 citations

Peers

Natalie Nardone
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Applied Psychology 145
  • Physiology 554
  • Ophthalmology 123
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 162
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 215
Replace Maria A. Parker with:
Maria A. Parker United States
Jennifer Kahende United States
Won Seok Choi South Korea
Suzanne Shoff United States
Pasquale Caponnetto Italy
Asia Sikora Kessler United States
Eleanor L.S. Leavens United States
Theodore L. Wagener United States
Elíseo J. Pérez-Stable United States
Margaret Mayer United States
Natalie Nardone relative to Maria A. Parker United States Maria A. Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Maria A. Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Nardone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Nardone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Nardone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Nardone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Nardone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Nardone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Nardone. The network helps show where Natalie Nardone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Nardone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Nardone Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Nardone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018152
2 200994
3 201476
4 201955
5 201944
6 201644
7 201643
8 201842
9 201336
10 201936
11 201930
12 201529
13 201727
14 201827
15 201424
16 201323
17 201622
18 201121
19 201920
20 201916

About Natalie Nardone

Natalie Nardone is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Applied Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (24 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (9 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (4 papers), Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers) and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (145 citations), Physiology (554 citations), Ophthalmology (123 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (162 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (215 citations). Natalie Nardone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Neal L. Benowitz, Gideon St. Helen, Gary Lewandowski, Peyton Jacob, Peyton Jacob, Newton Addo, Delia Dempsey, Dorothy K. Hatsukami, Eric C. Donny and Evangelia Liakoni. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Addiction, Tobacco Control, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact