Natalie J. Shook
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Russell H. FázioJenna M. WilsonBenjamin OosterhoffJohn A. TerrizziLaura G. KikenJerin LeeBarış SeviJ. Richard Eiser
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (34 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (23 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Natalie J. Shook
84 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- Social Psychology 1.3k
- Clinical Psychology 1.3k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 773
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 564
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie J. Shook
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie J. Shook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie J. Shook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie J. Shook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie J. Shook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie J. Shook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie J. Shook. The network helps show where Natalie J. Shook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie J. Shook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie J. Shook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie J. Shook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie J. Shook. Natalie J. Shook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 99 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Interracial contact: consequences for attitudes, relationships, and well-being | 2 |
About Natalie J. Shook
Natalie J. Shook is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 91 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (34 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (23 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (409 citations), Social Psychology (1.3k citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.3k citations). Natalie J. Shook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Russell H. Fázio, Jenna M. Wilson, Benjamin Oosterhoff, John A. Terrizzi, Laura G. Kiken, Jerin Lee, Barış Sevi, J. Richard Eiser, Holly N. Fitzgerald and Cara A. Palmer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, PLoS ONE and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.