Natalie Ingraham
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
Papers in
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 16
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 10
- Co-authors
- Sarah C. M. Roberts (3 shared papers)Erin Wingo (3 shared papers)Suzanne Haynes (6 shared papers)Jane A. McElroy (5 shared papers)Michèle J. Eliason (5 shared papers)Jennifer Lorvick (2 shared papers)Anu Manchikanti Gómez (2 shared papers)Jennet Arcara (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Women s Health Issues (8 papers)Fat Studies (2 papers)Contraception (2 papers)TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly (1 paper)Innovative Higher Education (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Natalie Ingraham
22 papers receiving 428 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Pharmacy 83
- Reproductive Medicine 121
- Social Psychology 239
- Clinical Psychology 117
- Gender Studies 51
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Ingraham
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Ingraham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Ingraham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Ingraham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Ingraham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Ingraham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Ingraham. The network helps show where Natalie Ingraham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Ingraham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 2 |
About Natalie Ingraham
Natalie Ingraham is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Reproductive Medicine, Pharmacy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (16 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (8 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (2 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (83 citations), Reproductive Medicine (121 citations), Social Psychology (239 citations), Clinical Psychology (117 citations) and Gender Studies (51 citations). Natalie Ingraham has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sarah C. M. Roberts, Erin Wingo, Suzanne Haynes, Jane A. McElroy, Michèle J. Eliason, Jennifer Lorvick, Anu Manchikanti Gómez, Jennet Arcara, Stephanie Arteaga and Sonya Satinsky. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Health Issues, Fat Studies, Contraception, TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly and Innovative Higher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.