Natalie Ingraham
Impact in
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Obesity and Health Practices
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
Papers in
-
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 12
-
- Reproductive Health and Technologies 5
- Co-authors
- Sarah C. M. Roberts (3 shared papers)Erin Wingo (3 shared papers)Suzanne Haynes (6 shared papers)Jane A. McElroy (5 shared papers)Michèle J. Eliason (5 shared papers)Jennifer Lorvick (2 shared papers)Anu Manchikanti Gómez (2 shared papers)Stephanie Arteaga (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Women s Health Issues (8 papers)Fat Studies (2 papers)Contraception (2 papers)Innovative Higher Education (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Natalie Ingraham
22 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Pharmacy 50
- Reproductive Medicine 80
- Social Psychology 199
- Clinical Psychology 79
- Research and Theory 3
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Ingraham
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Ingraham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Ingraham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Ingraham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Ingraham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Ingraham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Ingraham. The network helps show where Natalie Ingraham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Ingraham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 99 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 55 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 2 |
About Natalie Ingraham
Natalie Ingraham is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Reproductive Medicine, Pharmacy, Sociology and Political Science and Dermatology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 457 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (12 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (5 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (4 papers), Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Treatments (2 papers), Diversity and Impact of Dance (2 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (50 citations), Reproductive Medicine (80 citations), Social Psychology (199 citations), Clinical Psychology (79 citations) and Research and Theory (3 citations). Natalie Ingraham has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Sarah C. M. Roberts, Erin Wingo, Suzanne Haynes, Jane A. McElroy, Michèle J. Eliason, Jennifer Lorvick, Anu Manchikanti Gómez, Stephanie Arteaga, Jennet Arcara and Sonya Satinsky. Their work appears in journals such as Women s Health Issues, Fat Studies, Contraception, Innovative Higher Education and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.