Natalie Ingraham

679 total citations
25 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Natalie Ingraham is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Reproductive Medicine and Pharmacy. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Ingraham has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Social Psychology, 10 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 8 papers in Pharmacy. Recurrent topics in Natalie Ingraham's work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (16 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (8 papers). Natalie Ingraham is often cited by papers focused on LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (16 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (10 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (8 papers). Natalie Ingraham collaborates with scholars based in United States. Natalie Ingraham's co-authors include Sarah C. M. Roberts, Erin Wingo, Suzanne Haynes, Michèle J. Eliason, Jane A. McElroy, Jennifer Lorvick, Stephanie Arteaga, Anu Manchikanti Gómez, Jennet Arcara and Sonya Satinsky and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Contraception.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Ingraham

22 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Ingraham United States 10 239 123 121 117 83 25 445
Lee Ann E. Conard United States 14 334 1.4× 145 1.2× 127 1.0× 210 1.8× 25 0.3× 28 579
K. Nikki Barefoot United States 13 341 1.4× 40 0.3× 75 0.6× 199 1.7× 26 0.3× 19 525
Chadwick Taylor Rodgers United States 3 298 1.2× 100 0.8× 135 1.1× 147 1.3× 16 0.2× 4 462
Kristen D. Clark United States 13 357 1.5× 35 0.3× 88 0.7× 160 1.4× 13 0.2× 35 522
Katie Heiden‐Rootes United States 11 165 0.7× 50 0.4× 54 0.4× 94 0.8× 15 0.2× 44 285
Taylor Paglisotti United States 11 222 0.9× 26 0.2× 65 0.5× 110 0.9× 10 0.1× 16 391
Mai-Han Trinh United States 9 126 0.5× 55 0.4× 37 0.3× 45 0.4× 10 0.1× 16 341
Ethan C. Cicero United States 12 448 1.9× 56 0.5× 120 1.0× 145 1.2× 18 0.2× 29 556
Paul Guerino United States 9 229 1.0× 27 0.2× 42 0.3× 106 0.9× 11 0.1× 12 326
Kali D. Cyrus United States 8 219 0.9× 87 0.7× 31 0.3× 106 0.9× 16 0.2× 12 434

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Ingraham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Ingraham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Ingraham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Ingraham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Ingraham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Ingraham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Ingraham. The network helps show where Natalie Ingraham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Ingraham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Ingraham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Ingraham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Ingraham. Natalie Ingraham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
3.
Ingraham, Natalie, et al.. (2022). ‘Stigma R us’: Stigma management at the intersection of abortion care and transgender care in family planning clinics. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 100043–100043. 4 indexed citations
4.
Ingraham, Natalie, et al.. (2021). Clinic Staff Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Transgender Healthcare into Family Planning Clinics. Transgender Health. 7(1). 36–42. 5 indexed citations
5.
Khosla, Nidhi, Alina Engelman, Natalie Ingraham, et al.. (2020). “The Ones that Care Make all the Difference”: Perspectives on Student-Faculty Relationships. Innovative Higher Education. 46(1). 41–58. 51 indexed citations
6.
Gómez, Anu Manchikanti, Stephanie Arteaga, Natalie Ingraham, & Jennet Arcara. (2019). Medical conditions, pregnancy perspectives and contraceptive decision-making among young people: an exploratory, qualitative analysis. Contraception. 100(1). 72–78. 8 indexed citations
7.
Ingraham, Natalie & Natalie C. Boero. (2019). Thick Bodies, Thick Skins: Reflections on Two Decades of Sociology in Fat Studies. Fat Studies. 9(2). 114–125. 2 indexed citations
8.
Wingo, Erin, Natalie Ingraham, & Sarah C. M. Roberts. (2018). Reproductive Health Care Priorities and Barriers to Effective Care for LGBTQ People Assigned Female at Birth: A Qualitative Study. Women s Health Issues. 28(4). 350–357. 97 indexed citations
9.
Ingraham, Natalie, Erin Wingo, & Sarah C. M. Roberts. (2018). Inclusion of LGBTQ persons in research related to pregnancy risk: a cognitive interview study. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health. 44(4). 292–298. 8 indexed citations
10.
Gómez, Anu Manchikanti, et al.. (2018). It's Not Planned, But Is It Okay? The Acceptability of Unplanned Pregnancy Among Young People. Women s Health Issues. 28(5). 408–414. 54 indexed citations
11.
Ingraham, Natalie. (2018). Perceptions of body size and health among older queer women of size following participation in a health programme. Culture Health & Sexuality. 21(6). 636–649. 2 indexed citations
12.
Ingraham, Natalie, et al.. (2017). Best practices for LGBTQ inclusion and exclusion in reproductive health research. Contraception. 96(4). 299–299. 1 indexed citations
13.
Wood, Susan F., Michèle J. Eliason, Samantha Garbers, et al.. (2016). Recruitment and Participation of Older Lesbian and Bisexual Women in Intervention Research. Women s Health Issues. 26. S43–S52. 6 indexed citations
14.
McElroy, Jane A., Samantha Garbers, Cheryl J. McDonnell, et al.. (2016). Program Design for Healthy Weight in Lesbian and Bisexual Women: A Ten-City Prevention Initiative. Women s Health Issues. 26. S7–S17. 15 indexed citations
15.
Ingraham, Natalie, et al.. (2016). Two Tailored Provider Curricula Promoting Healthy Weight in Lesbian and Bisexual Women. Women s Health Issues. 26. S36–S42. 6 indexed citations
16.
Ingraham, Natalie, Michèle J. Eliason, Samantha Garbers, et al.. (2016). Effects of Mindfulness Interventions on Health Outcomes in Older Lesbian/Bisexual Women. Women s Health Issues. 26. S53–S62. 18 indexed citations
17.
Garbers, Samantha, Cheryl J. McDonnell, Michèle J. Eliason, et al.. (2015). Aging, Weight, and Health Among Adult Lesbian and Bisexual Women: A Metasynthesis of the Multisite “Healthy Weight Initiative” Focus Groups. LGBT Health. 2(2). 176–187. 17 indexed citations
18.
Eliason, Michèle J., et al.. (2015). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Weight in Sexual Minority Women. Women s Health Issues. 25(2). 162–175. 83 indexed citations
19.
Ingraham, Natalie, Sarah C. M. Roberts, & Tracy A. Weitz. (2014). Prior Family Planning Experiences of Obese Women Seeking Abortion Care. Women s Health Issues. 24(1). e125–e130. 11 indexed citations
20.
Satinsky, Sonya & Natalie Ingraham. (2014). At the Intersection of Public Health and Fat Studies: Critical Perspectives on the Measurement of Body Size. Fat Studies. 3(2). 143–154. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lee Ann E. Conard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K. Nikki Barefoot Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chadwick Taylor Rodgers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kristen D. Clark Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katie Heiden‐Rootes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Taylor Paglisotti Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mai-Han Trinh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ethan C. Cicero Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul Guerino Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kali D. Cyrus
Rankless by CCL
2026