Natalie G. Schimpf

1.2k total citations
8 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

Natalie G. Schimpf is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie G. Schimpf has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 4 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Natalie G. Schimpf's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Natalie G. Schimpf is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Natalie G. Schimpf collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Mexico. Natalie G. Schimpf's co-authors include Craig R. White, Philip G. D. Matthews, Phillip Cassey, Robbie S. Wilson, Jonathan A. Green, Steven J. Portugal, Lewis G. Halsey, Laura K. Weir, Tamara M. Rodela and Patricia M. Schulte and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Evolution and Journal of Experimental Biology.

In The Last Decade

Natalie G. Schimpf

7 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers

Natalie G. Schimpf
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Ecology 209
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 171
  • Genetics 89
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 44
  • Insect Science 43
Replace Francisca Boher with:
Francisca Boher Chile
Mélanie McClure France
Angelika G. Denk Germany
Janice R. Matthews United States
Mikus Āboliņš-Ābols United States
René Beamonte‐Barrientos Mexico
Philip A. Downing Sweden
Sarah Guindre‐Parker United States
Gaia Bazzi Italy
Ragna Franz Germany
Francisca Boher Chile View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Natalie G. Schimpf
Natalie G. Schimpf · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Natalie G. Schimpf
Natalie G. Schimpf · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie G. Schimpf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie G. Schimpf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie G. Schimpf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie G. Schimpf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie G. Schimpf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie G. Schimpf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie G. Schimpf. The network helps show where Natalie G. Schimpf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie G. Schimpf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie G. Schimpf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie G. Schimpf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie G. Schimpf. Natalie G. Schimpf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 35
2 0
3 19
4 23
5 89
6 59
7 56
8 46

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026