Laura K. Weir
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Genetics top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Co-authors
- James W. A. GrantJeffrey A. HutchingsLouis BernatchezCindy BreauJames WA GrantSigurd EinumIan FlemingDylan J. Fraser
- Topics
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies (19 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers)Marine and fisheries research (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsAquatic Science
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Laura K. Weir
35 papers receiving 929 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 426
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 398
- Genetics 309
- Ecology 254
- Global and Planetary Change 188
Countries citing papers authored by Laura K. Weir
This map shows the geographic impact of Laura K. Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura K. Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura K. Weir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Laura K. Weir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura K. Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura K. Weir. The network helps show where Laura K. Weir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Laura K. Weir
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Laura K. Weir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Laura K. Weir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Laura K. Weir. Laura K. Weir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | A comparison of nuptial coloration and breeding behaviour in white and common marine Threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) ecotypes | 7 |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 176 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 223 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | Geographic distribution: Hemidactylium scutatum (four-toed salamander.) USA: Maine | 2 |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 78 |
About Laura K. Weir
Laura K. Weir is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Physiology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 964 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (19 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (426 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (398 citations) and Aquatic Science (133 citations). Laura K. Weir has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James W. A. Grant, Jeffrey A. Hutchings, Louis Bernatchez, Cindy Breau, James WA Grant, Sigurd Einum, Ian Fleming, Dylan J. Fraser, Richard A. Cunjak and James D. Eddington. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The American Naturalist and Oecologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.