Natalie Evans

1.8k citations
57 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Evans

55 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Natalie Evans
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Health Informatics 43
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 707
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 74
  • Clinical Psychology 298
  • General Health Professions 308
Replace Marlene Camacho‐Rivera with:
Marlene Camacho‐Rivera United States
Holly Etchegary Canada
Joan Scott United States
Meghan C. Halley United States
Stephanie Sivell United Kingdom
Alison Metcalfe United Kingdom
Vardit Ravitsky Canada
Amanda T. Wiggins United States
Simon Woods United Kingdom
Addie Wootten Australia
Natalie Evans relative to Marlene Camacho‐Rivera United States Marlene Camacho‐Rivera's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Marlene Camacho‐Rivera · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Evans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Evans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Evans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Evans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Evans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Evans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Evans. The network helps show where Natalie Evans may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Evans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Evans Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Evans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20232
3 20232
4 20234
5 202211
6 20223
7 20222
8 20223
9 20227
10 20211
11 202121
12 201511
13 201325
14 201365
15 201217
16 201139
17 201162
18 201159
19 201178
20 2001149

About Natalie Evans

Natalie Evans is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Safety Research, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Internal Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (18 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (14 papers), Academic integrity and plagiarism (12 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (10 papers), Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (8 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (43 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (707 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (74 citations), Clinical Psychology (298 citations) and General Health Professions (308 citations). Natalie Evans has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Irene J Higginson, Richard Harding, Arantza Meñaca, Robert Pool, Marjolein Gysels, Erin V. W. Andrew, Tim Forsyth, H. Roeline W. Pasman, Franco Toscani and Guy Widdershoven. Their work appears in journals such as Science and Engineering Ethics, PLoS ONE, Accountability in Research, Journal of Pain and Symptom Management and Palliative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026