Natalie Cope

946 citations
18 papers · 665 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Natalie Cope

17 papers receiving 650 citations

Peers

Natalie Cope
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 436
  • Statistics and Probability 153
  • Family Practice 39
  • Genetics 307
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 142
Replace Janet G. Walter with:
Janet G. Walter United States
Haiying Meng United States
Tom S. Scerri United Kingdom
Gary Hill United States
Luigi Marotta Italy
Ellen Plume Germany
Nina Neuhoff Germany
Prakash Padakannaya India
Gesa Schaadt Germany
Donna L. Orsini United States
Natalie Cope relative to Janet G. Walter United States Janet G. Walter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Janet G. Walter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Cope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Cope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Cope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Cope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Cope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Cope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Cope. The network helps show where Natalie Cope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalie Cope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalie Cope Line = papers co-authored together Natalie Cope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2005240
2 2006127
3 201161
4 201249
5 201046
6 200746
7 201831
8 202115
9 200210
10
A Psychiatric Rehabilitation Demonstration for Individuals who are Street Dwelling and Seriously Disabled
19978
11 20197
12 20217
13
Post-translational control of human hemoglobin synthesis; the number of alpha chain genes and the synthesis of HB S.
19787
14 20224
15 20233
16 20243
17 20231
18 20240

About Natalie Cope

Natalie Cope is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Genetics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Molecular Biology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (6 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (6 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (436 citations), Statistics and Probability (153 citations), Family Practice (39 citations), Genetics (307 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (142 citations). Natalie Cope has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Valentina Moskvina, Denise Harold, Julie Williams, Michael O’Donovan, Gary Hill, Michael J. Owen, Jim Stevenson, Peter Holmans, Haiying Meng and Jeffrey R. Gruen. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Molecular Psychiatry, Advances in Health Sciences Education, Brain Imaging and Behavior and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact