Natalie Butterfield
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Spectroscopy
- Instrumentation
- Geophysics
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Co-authors
- Elisabeth A. C. MillsM. MorrisJ. OttDavid T. ChussJordan A. GuerraClaudia LangAdam GinsburgEdward J. Wollack
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (13 papers)Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astronomical Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Natalie Butterfield
16 papers receiving 99 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 125
- Spectroscopy 18
- Instrumentation 13
- Geophysics 13
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 12
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Butterfield
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Butterfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Butterfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Butterfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Butterfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Butterfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Butterfield. The network helps show where Natalie Butterfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Butterfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Butterfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Butterfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Butterfield. Natalie Butterfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | Argus144: High resolution molecular gas mapping with a 144-element W-Band Array on the Green Bank Telescope | 1 |
| 13 | Advanced Capabilities for the Green Bank Telescope | 1 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 16 |
About Natalie Butterfield
Natalie Butterfield is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Spectroscopy, having authored 18 papers that have together received 130 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (14 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (13 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (125 citations), Instrumentation (13 citations) and Spectroscopy (18 citations). Natalie Butterfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth A. C. Mills, M. Morris, J. Ott, David T. Chuss, Jordan A. Guerra, Claudia Lang, Adam Ginsburg, Edward J. Wollack, S. C. Gallagher and P. Tzanavaris. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astronomical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.