Christopher M. Faesi
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Spectroscopy
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- Atmospheric Science
- Co-authors
- Jan ForbrichC. J. LadaAndreas SchrubaMélanie ChevanceJ. M. Diederik KruijssenFrank BigielDyas UtomoEva Schinnerer
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers)Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalAstronomy and AstrophysicsPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySpain
In The Last Decade
Christopher M. Faesi
9 papers receiving 163 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 169
- Instrumentation 26
- Spectroscopy 20
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 12
- Atmospheric Science 9
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher M. Faesi
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher M. Faesi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher M. Faesi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher M. Faesi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher M. Faesi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher M. Faesi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher M. Faesi. The network helps show where Christopher M. Faesi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher M. Faesi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher M. Faesi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher M. Faesi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher M. Faesi. Christopher M. Faesi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | Physics at High Angular resolution in Nearby Galaxies (PHANGS) | 1 |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 6 |
About Christopher M. Faesi
Christopher M. Faesi is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 9 papers that have together received 173 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (169 citations), Instrumentation (26 citations) and Spectroscopy (20 citations). Christopher M. Faesi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Jan Forbrich, C. J. Lada, Andreas Schruba, Mélanie Chevance, J. M. Diederik Kruijssen, Frank Bigiel, Dyas Utomo, Eva Schinnerer, H. Bouy and Erik Rosolowsky. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.