Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Morris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Morris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Morris more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Morris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Morris. The network helps show where M. Morris may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Morris
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Morris.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Morris based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Morris. M. Morris is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Witzel, Gunther, Breann Sitarski, A. M. Ghez, et al.. (2017). The Post-periapsis Evolution of Galactic Center Source G1: The Second Case of a Resolved Tidal Interaction with a Supermassive Black Hole. eScholarship (California Digital Library).29 indexed citations
10.
Chappell, Samantha, A. M. Ghez, Tuan Do, et al.. (2016). The late-type stellar density profile in the Galactic Center: A statistical approach. eScholarship (California Digital Library).1 indexed citations
11.
Sitarski, Breann, A. M. Ghez, M. Morris, et al.. (2015). Galactic Center Source G1 and other G2-like Sources. AAS. 225.1 indexed citations
12.
Sitarski, Breann, Tuan Do, Gunther Witzel, et al.. (2014). Is G2 Alone? Other Infrared Sources in the Central 0.04 Parsecs of the Galactic Center. 223.1 indexed citations
Morris, M., et al.. (2011). The galactic center : a window to the nuclear environment of disk galaxies : proceedings of a workshop held at Shanghai, China, 19-23 October 2009. Astronomical Society of the Pacific eBooks.
16.
Smith, R. L., K. M. Pontoppidan, Edward Young, & M. Morris. (2011). Observational Signatures of 12 CO- 13 CO Partitioning in Ice and Gas Towards Local Young Stellar Objects and Molecular Clouds. 280. 341.1 indexed citations
17.
Young, Edward, M. Gounelle, R. L. Smith, M. Morris, & K. M. Pontoppidan. (2009). The Oxygen Isotopic Composition of the Solar System in a Galactic Context: New Results for CO in Young Stellar Objects and Implications for the Birth Environment of the Solar System. LPI. 1967.2 indexed citations
18.
Cotera, A., M. Morris, A. M. Ghez, et al.. (1999). Mid-Infrared Imaging of the Central Parsec with Keck. ASPC. 186. 240.3 indexed citations
19.
Žmuidzinas, J., J. Keene, T. G. Phillips, et al.. (1997). A Submillimeter/Far-IR Heterodyne Receiver for SOFIA. American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. 191.3 indexed citations
20.
Morris, M., et al.. (1982). Bipolar Reflection Nebulae: Monte Carlo Simulations. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 14. 637.76 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.