Natália Bebiano
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Applied Mathematics top 2%
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Co-authors
- João da ProvidênciaSusana FurtadoChi-Kwong LiGuoliang ChenHiroshi NakazatoIlya M. SpitkovskyJorma K. MerikoskiCarlos M. da Fonseca
- Topics
- Matrix Theory and Algorithms (70 papers)Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (24 papers)Advanced Topics in Algebra (15 papers)
In The Last Decade
Natália Bebiano
86 papers receiving 457 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 354
- Applied Mathematics 211
- Mathematical Physics 149
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 114
- Geometry and Topology 109
Countries citing papers authored by Natália Bebiano
This map shows the geographic impact of Natália Bebiano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natália Bebiano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natália Bebiano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natália Bebiano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natália Bebiano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natália Bebiano. The network helps show where Natália Bebiano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natália Bebiano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natália Bebiano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natália Bebiano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natália Bebiano. Natália Bebiano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Revisiting the inverse field of values problema | 4 |
| 7 | A Note on Indefinite Chaotic Order | 0 |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | Interdependence of some problems arising in generalizing the Marcus-de Oliveira determinantal conjecture | 0 |
| 17 | Some variations on the concept of the c-numerical range | 7 |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Natália Bebiano
Natália Bebiano is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 100 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Matrix Theory and Algorithms (70 papers), Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (24 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (354 citations), Applied Mathematics (211 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (85 citations). Natália Bebiano has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include João da Providência, Susana Furtado, Chi-Kwong Li, Guoliang Chen, Hiroshi Nakazato, Ilya M. Spitkovsky, Jorma K. Merikoski, Carlos M. da Fonseca, Rosário Fernandes and Yiu‐Tung Poon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Applied Mathematics and Computation and Journal of Mathematical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.