Mary Orr

1.9k citations
52 papers · 813 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 8

Mary Orr

37 papers receiving 492 citations

Hit Papers

Reading Autobiography: A Guide for Interpreting Life Narr...4812003202620102018100200300400

Peers

Mary Orr
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Literature and Literary Theory 307
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 70
  • History 115
  • Philosophy 117
  • Cultural Studies 71
Replace Sharon Marcus with:
Sharon Marcus United States
Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht United States
Vincent B. Leitch
Avital Ronell United States
Frank Lentricchia United States
Jane Gallop United States
Ross Chambers United States
Hans H. Rudnick
Jonathan Dollimore United Kingdom
Pierre Macherey France
Mary Orr relative to Sharon Marcus United States Sharon Marcus's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sharon Marcus · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Orr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Orr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Orr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Orr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Orr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Orr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Orr. The network helps show where Mary Orr may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Mary Orr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary Orr Line = papers co-authored together Mary Orr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20220
2
Illuminating Past Labor: Making Transformation Processes of Historical Documents Visible.
20201
3 20143
4 20110
5 20104
6 20082
7 20070
8 20065
9 20051
10
From Goethe to Gide: feminism, aesthetics and the literary canon in France and Germany, 1770-1936
20052
11
From Goethe to Gide : feminism, aesthetics and the French and German literary canon 1770-1936
20054
12
Intertextuality: Debates and Contexts
200393
13 20007
14
New approaches in Flaubert studies
19993
15 199853
16 19981
17 19960
18 19940
19 19923
20 19881

About Mary Orr

Mary Orr is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Literature and Literary Theory and Classics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 813 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Criticism (9 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (8 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (8 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (7 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (6 papers), History of Science and Natural History (5 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (4 papers) and French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (307 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (70 citations) and History (115 citations). Mary Orr has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Sidonie Smith, Julia Watson, John Stewart, Mary Jacobus, Warren Motte, Lesley Sharpe, Uta Hinrichs, Margaret Atack, Peter V. Zima and Celia Britton. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, French Studies, French Studies Bulletin, Forum for Modern Language Studies and Geological Society London Special Publications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026