Naomi Smith
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Timothy GrahamPeter WaltersMarian BarnesCatherine UnwinJohn RossNeil GreenbergSimon WesselyAmy Iversen
- Topics
- Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers)Social Media and Politics (3 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers)
- Cited by
- EquineHealthCommunication
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe British Journal of PsychiatryAge and Ageing
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Naomi Smith
28 papers receiving 629 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Sociology and Political Science 236
- Health 158
- Clinical Psychology 139
- General Health Professions 118
- Social Psychology 76
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Smith. The network helps show where Naomi Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Smith. Naomi Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | New Subjectivities of Work?: Technologies and Capitalism into the Future | 1 |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | External evaluation of the Alzheimer's Society Carer Information and Support Programme (CrISP) | 3 |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | Working towards prevention: The independent evaluation of the West Sussex Partnerships for older people project (POPP) | 1 |
| 19 | 117 | |
| 20 | The effect of mood states on eating behavior among restrained and unrestrained eaters | 1 |
About Naomi Smith
Naomi Smith is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Equine and Communication, having authored 30 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (5 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (34 citations), Health (158 citations) and Communication (53 citations). Naomi Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Graham, Peter Walters, Marian Barnes, Catherine Unwin, John Ross, Neil Greenberg, Simon Wessely, Amy Iversen, Matthew Hotopf and Rebecca Walwyn. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Age and Ageing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.