Amber S. Emanuel

27 total papers · 891 total citations
16 papers, 682 citations indexed

About

Amber S. Emanuel is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber S. Emanuel has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 682 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Applied Psychology, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amber S. Emanuel's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers). Amber S. Emanuel is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers). Amber S. Emanuel collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Amber S. Emanuel's co-authors include John A. Updegraff, Kristel M. Gallagher, Jeffrey A. Ciesla, Laura C. Reilly, Jennifer L. Howell, Kelsey S. Dickson, James A. Shepperd, Marc T. Kiviniemi, Jennifer L. Hay and Heather Orom and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Public Health, Social Science & Medicine and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Amber S. Emanuel

16 papers receiving 652 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Amber S. Emanuel 238 163 156 140 118 16 682
Jeanette M. Renaud 99 0.4× 143 0.9× 132 0.8× 128 0.9× 177 1.5× 27 731
İbrahim Şenay 380 1.6× 145 0.9× 99 0.6× 110 0.8× 165 1.4× 18 675
Christina Norman 154 0.6× 186 1.1× 135 0.9× 317 2.3× 82 0.7× 18 653
Rebecca G. Burzette 289 1.2× 209 1.3× 118 0.8× 243 1.7× 151 1.3× 24 761
Jan‐Are K. Johnsen 122 0.5× 153 0.9× 164 1.1× 108 0.8× 201 1.7× 34 672
Nan Zhao 238 1.0× 327 2.0× 139 0.9× 87 0.6× 84 0.7× 26 720
Melinda Beckwith 179 0.8× 128 0.8× 69 0.4× 184 1.3× 384 3.3× 17 785
Eveline Teppers 224 0.9× 256 1.6× 66 0.4× 188 1.3× 42 0.4× 13 620
Bartlett H. Stoodley 252 1.1× 150 0.9× 62 0.4× 203 1.4× 84 0.7× 12 642
Patrick Klaiber 313 1.3× 67 0.4× 107 0.7× 224 1.6× 106 0.9× 18 629

Countries citing papers authored by Amber S. Emanuel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber S. Emanuel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber S. Emanuel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber S. Emanuel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber S. Emanuel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber S. Emanuel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber S. Emanuel. The network helps show where Amber S. Emanuel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber S. Emanuel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber S. Emanuel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber S. Emanuel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber S. Emanuel. Amber S. Emanuel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026