Jane Goodwin

766 total citations
29 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

Jane Goodwin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Goodwin has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Clinical Psychology, 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Jane Goodwin's work include Family and Disability Support Research (17 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (8 papers). Jane Goodwin is often cited by papers focused on Family and Disability Support Research (17 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (12 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (8 papers). Jane Goodwin collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Jane Goodwin's co-authors include Linda Campbell, Lynne McCormack, Jean-Paul Moisan, Ian Wilson, Chris Tyler‐Smith, Turi King, Christelle Richard, Guido Barbujani, Georgina R. Bowden and Zoë H. Rosser and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS Biology, Health Psychology and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Jane Goodwin

27 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane Goodwin United Kingdom 13 172 159 96 89 60 29 468
Jennifer Anderson United States 8 124 0.7× 41 0.3× 22 0.2× 138 1.6× 28 0.5× 16 430
Annica Gosch Germany 11 275 1.6× 157 1.0× 30 0.3× 90 1.0× 13 0.2× 25 935
Michelle Hamilton United States 11 32 0.2× 63 0.4× 22 0.2× 46 0.5× 166 2.8× 25 470
Hartmut A.G. Bosinski Germany 14 249 1.4× 62 0.4× 66 0.7× 213 2.4× 9 0.1× 41 724
Åse Fagerlund Finland 11 94 0.5× 30 0.2× 22 0.2× 19 0.2× 22 0.4× 24 598
Liming Zhou China 9 34 0.2× 21 0.1× 111 1.2× 59 0.7× 50 0.8× 20 315
Craig A. Cunningham United States 14 98 0.6× 28 0.2× 4 0.0× 32 0.4× 43 0.7× 60 467
Diana Weiting Tan Australia 11 131 0.8× 59 0.4× 190 2.0× 30 0.3× 4 0.1× 38 400
Barış Özener Türkiye 11 49 0.3× 60 0.4× 101 1.1× 4 0.0× 94 1.6× 26 429
Mirella Dragone Italy 9 96 0.6× 61 0.4× 18 0.2× 17 0.2× 122 2.0× 26 383

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Goodwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Goodwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Goodwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Goodwin. The network helps show where Jane Goodwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Goodwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Goodwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Goodwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Goodwin. Jane Goodwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bhattarai, Nawaraj, Jane Goodwin, Mirabel Pelton, et al.. (2025). Health economic evaluation of Autism Adapted Safety Plans: findings on feasibility of tools from a pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research. 25(1). 473–473.
3.
Campbell, Linda, et al.. (2025). “People Thought I Was a Dreadful Mother”: Stigma Experienced by Parents with an Autistic Child Who Exhibits Aggressive Behaviour. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. 10(1). 144–152. 1 indexed citations
4.
Goodwin, Jane, Richard Chin, Ava Easton, et al.. (2024). UK research priority setting for childhood neurological conditions. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 66(12). 1590–1599. 3 indexed citations
5.
Goodwin, Jane, Sally O’Keeffe, Nawaraj Bhattarai, et al.. (2024). Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community. Autism in Adulthood. 7(3). 293–302. 6 indexed citations
6.
Cassidy, Sarah, Mirabel Pelton, Jane Goodwin, et al.. (2024). Feasibility and acceptability of autism adapted safety plans: an external pilot randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine. 73. 102662–102662. 8 indexed citations
7.
Rodgers, Jacqui, Jane Goodwin, Emma Nielsen, et al.. (2023). Adapted suicide safety plans to address self-harm, suicidal ideation, and suicide behaviours in autistic adults: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 9(1). 31–31. 14 indexed citations
8.
Rodgers, Jacqui, Jane Goodwin, Deborah Garland, et al.. (2022). Coping with uncertainty in everyday situations (CUES©) to address intolerance of uncertainty in autistic children: an intervention feasibility trial. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 53(9). 3460–3474. 17 indexed citations
9.
Wagstaff, Danielle, et al.. (2022). Mothering Ideology: A Qualitative Exploration of Mothers’ Perceptions of Navigating Motherhood Pressures and Partner Relationships. Sex Roles. 88(1-2). 101–117. 28 indexed citations
11.
Goodwin, Jane, et al.. (2021). Stigma Associated with Parenting an Autistic Child with Aggressive Behaviour: a Systematic Review. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 10(2). 281–294. 8 indexed citations
12.
13.
Goodwin, Jane, Jan Lecouturier, Johanna Smith, et al.. (2019). Understanding frames: A qualitative exploration of standing frame use for young people with cerebral palsy in educational settings. Child Care Health and Development. 45(3). 433–439. 9 indexed citations
14.
Goodwin, Jane, et al.. (2019). ‘We've made the best of it. But we do not have a normal life’: families' experiences of tuberous sclerosis complex and seizure management. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 63(8). 947–956. 12 indexed citations
15.
Goodwin, Jane, Jan Lecouturier, Anna Basu, et al.. (2018). Standing frames for children with cerebral palsy: a mixed-methods feasibility study. Health Technology Assessment. 22(50). 1–232. 11 indexed citations
16.
Goodwin, Jane, et al.. (2018). Fifteen-minute consultation: Modern-day art and science of managing cerebral palsy. Archives of Disease in Childhood Education & Practice. 104(2). 66–73. 5 indexed citations
17.
Goodwin, Jane, Allan Colver, Anna Basu, et al.. (2017). Understanding frames: A UK survey of parents and professionals regarding the use of standing frames for children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health and Development. 44(2). 195–202. 20 indexed citations
18.
Goodwin, Jane, Jan Lecouturier, Johanna Smith, et al.. (2017). Understanding frames: A qualitative study of young people's experiences of using standing frames as part of postural management for cerebral palsy. Child Care Health and Development. 44(2). 203–211. 12 indexed citations
19.
Goodwin, Jane, Lynne McCormack, & Linda Campbell. (2016). “You don’t know until you get there”: The positive and negative “lived” experience of parenting an adult child with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.. Health Psychology. 36(1). 45–54. 25 indexed citations
20.
Balaresque, Patricia, Georgina R. Bowden, Susan M. Adams, et al.. (2010). A Predominantly Neolithic Origin for European Paternal Lineages. PLoS Biology. 8(1). e1000285–e1000285. 155 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026