Naomi J. Spence
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Daniel E. AdkinsDavid RussellIsaac W. EbersteinMatthew E. DupreGlen H. ElderWilliam E. WhiteheadR. Julian HafnerErin D. Bouldin
- Topics
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers)Gender, Security, and Conflict (4 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthClinical PsychologyDemography
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSocial Science & MedicineSocial Forces
- Partner nations
- United StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Naomi J. Spence
18 papers receiving 473 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Clinical Psychology 157
- Sociology and Political Science 139
- General Health Professions 133
- Health 107
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 68
Countries citing papers authored by Naomi J. Spence
This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi J. Spence's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi J. Spence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi J. Spence more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi J. Spence
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi J. Spence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi J. Spence. The network helps show where Naomi J. Spence may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi J. Spence
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi J. Spence. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi J. Spence based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi J. Spence. Naomi J. Spence is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 52 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 60 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 94 | |
| 17 | Reproductive Patterns and Women's Later Life Health | 4 |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Naomi J. Spence
Naomi J. Spence is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Health and Demography, having authored 22 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (5 papers), Gender, Security, and Conflict (4 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (107 citations), Clinical Psychology (157 citations) and Demography (68 citations). Naomi J. Spence has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Daniel E. Adkins, David Russell, Isaac W. Eberstein, Matthew E. Dupre, Glen H. Elder, William E. Whitehead, R. Julian Hafner, Erin D. Bouldin, Shrikant I. Bangdiwala and Miranda A.L. van Tilburg. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.