Nancy O’Connor

18 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Nancy O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Research and Theory 26
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 35
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 49
  • General Health Professions 226
Replace Sheila Grossman with:
Sheila Grossman United States
Kathleen Blais United States
Jean Lange United States
Elaine L. La Monica United States
Ingela Berggren Sweden
Queen Utley‐Smith United States
Elena O. Siegel United States
Siri Tønnessen Norway
Randi Skår Norway
Lorraine Ellis United Kingdom
Nancy O’Connor relative to Sheila Grossman United States Sheila Grossman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Sheila Grossman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy O’Connor. The network helps show where Nancy O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Nancy O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together Nancy O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2013145
2 201177
3 201431
4 197821
5 201420
6 201415
7 198914
8 200013
9 201413
10 201713
11 200012
12 201312
13 20149
14 20178
15
Paterson and Zderad: Humanistic Nursing Theory
19926
16 19896
17 20015
18 20022
19
Letting Go With Love : The Grieving Process
20180

About Nancy O’Connor

Nancy O’Connor is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Epidemiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 422 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (4 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Infrared Thermography in Medicine (1 paper) and Nosocomial Infections in ICU (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (26 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (35 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (49 citations) and General Health Professions (226 citations). Nancy O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Hanson, Deborah Dunn, Susan M. Hasenau, Trace Kershaw, Deborah Oakley, Mary J. Denyes, Deborah A. Dunn, Margo A. Halm, Linda M. Benson and Emily F. Conant. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Journal of Nursing Scholarship.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact