Deborah Oakley

1.8k total citations
66 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Deborah Oakley is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Oakley has authored 66 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in General Health Professions, 23 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 14 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Deborah Oakley's work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (18 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (10 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (9 papers). Deborah Oakley is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Health and Contraception (18 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (10 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (9 papers). Deborah Oakley collaborates with scholars based in United States, Iran and China. Deborah Oakley's co-authors include Linda S. Potter, Carolyn M. Sampselle, Julia S. Seng, Cheryl Killion, Barbara Guthrie, Susan M. Sereika, Nooshin Peyman, SeonAe Yeo, B Petersen and Jacqueline E. Darroch and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Public Health, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Oakley

63 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah Oakley United States 23 688 502 401 302 159 66 1.4k
Heike Thiel de Bocanegra United States 19 833 1.2× 344 0.7× 613 1.5× 410 1.4× 178 1.1× 62 1.2k
Holly B. Shulman United States 13 720 1.0× 290 0.6× 591 1.5× 555 1.8× 149 0.9× 25 1.4k
Wendy Chavkin United States 24 513 0.7× 597 1.2× 625 1.6× 219 0.7× 248 1.6× 76 1.5k
Lisa Romero United States 20 652 0.9× 892 1.8× 543 1.4× 333 1.1× 172 1.1× 60 1.6k
Benjamin Vaughan United Kingdom 15 827 1.2× 481 1.0× 506 1.3× 243 0.8× 48 0.3× 46 1.3k
Renee Schwalberg United States 15 330 0.5× 506 1.0× 297 0.7× 213 0.7× 285 1.8× 23 1.2k
Marie Klingberg‐Allvin Sweden 24 703 1.0× 476 0.9× 929 2.3× 383 1.3× 330 2.1× 80 1.5k
Rachel Thompson Australia 21 750 1.1× 1.2k 2.4× 563 1.4× 327 1.1× 300 1.9× 75 2.1k
Angela Nannini United States 21 308 0.4× 419 0.8× 831 2.1× 340 1.1× 85 0.5× 41 1.5k
Tina Raine United States 27 1.4k 2.0× 952 1.9× 1.0k 2.5× 508 1.7× 93 0.6× 50 2.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Oakley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Oakley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Oakley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Oakley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Oakley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Oakley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Oakley. The network helps show where Deborah Oakley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Oakley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Oakley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Oakley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Oakley. Deborah Oakley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (2013). RESEARCH INTO STUDENT LEARNING EXPERIENCES IN ARCHITECTURAL STRUCTURES CLASSES: A MULTI-YEAR SYSTEMATIC STUDY. 2653–2662.
2.
Hsieh, Hsing‐Fang, et al.. (2011). Ethnicity and Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among Asian Americans Residing in Michigan. Journal of Community Health. 36(5). 811–818. 16 indexed citations
3.
Peyman, Nooshin, et al.. (2010). Self-efficacy: does it predict the effectiveness of contraceptive use in Iranian women?. PubMed. 15(5). 1254–62. 22 indexed citations
4.
Rahnama, Parvin, Alireza Hidarnia, Farkhondeh Amin Shokravi, et al.. (2010). Why Iranian married women use withdrawal instead of oral contraceptives? A qualitative study from Iran. BMC Public Health. 10(1). 289–289. 23 indexed citations
5.
Liu, Caiyan, et al.. (2010). Nursing clinical trial of breast self‐examination education in China. International Nursing Review. 57(1). 128–134. 7 indexed citations
6.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (2005). Why Do Women Miss Oral Contraceptive Pills? An Analysis of Women's Self‐Described Reasons for Missed Pills. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 50(5). 380–385. 46 indexed citations
7.
Guthrie, Barbara, et al.. (2001). Using Cognitive Theory to Improve Nurse Practitioners' Anticipatory Guidance With Contraceptive Pill Users. Journal of Community Health Nursing. 18(4). 223–234. 5 indexed citations
8.
Low, Lisa Kane, et al.. (2000). CLINICIAN‐SPECIFIC EPISIOTOMY RATES: IMPACT ON PERINEAL OUTCOMES. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 45(2). 87–93. 23 indexed citations
9.
Scisney‐Matlock, Margaret, et al.. (2000). Measuring behavior: Electronic devices in nursing studies. Applied Nursing Research. 13(2). 97–102. 2 indexed citations
10.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (1999). Combining Qualitative with Quantitative Approaches to Study Contraceptive Pill Use. Journal of women's health. 8(2). 249–257. 19 indexed citations
11.
Sampselle, Carolyn M., Julia S. Seng, SeonAe Yeo, Cheryl Killion, & Deborah Oakley. (1999). Physical Activity and Postpartum Well-Being. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 28(1). 41–49. 93 indexed citations
12.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (1996). Pathways of influence on fifth and eighth graders' reports about having had sexual intercourse. Research in Nursing & Health. 19(3). 193–204. 28 indexed citations
13.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (1996). Comparisons of outcomes of maternity care by obstetricians and certified nurse-midwives. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 88(5). 823–829. 58 indexed citations
14.
Oakley, Deborah. (1995). Processes of care Comparisons of certified nurse-midwives and obstetricians. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 40(5). 399–409. 39 indexed citations
15.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (1995). Quality of condom use as reported by female clients of a family planning clinic.. American Journal of Public Health. 85(11). 1526–1530. 27 indexed citations
16.
Sampselle, Carolyn M., et al.. (1992). Prevalence of abuse among pregnant women choosing certified nurse-midwife or physician providers. Journal of Nurse-Midwifery. 37(4). 269–273. 46 indexed citations
17.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (1991). Collaboration as an Organizational Process. Journal of Nursing Education. 30(4). 189–191. 1 indexed citations
18.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (1990). Public Health Nurses and Family Planning. Public Health Nursing. 7(3). 175–180. 2 indexed citations
19.
Oakley, Deborah, et al.. (1990). A scale to measure microbehaviors of oral contraceptive pill use. Social Biology. 37(3-4). 215–222. 7 indexed citations
20.
Kennedy, Mary B., Deborah Oakley, & Mary J. Denyes. (1988). Socialization of Nurse Scientists: The Graduate Student as Research Assistant. Journal of Nursing Education. 27(8). 371–372. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Heike Thiel de Bocanegra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Holly B. Shulman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Wendy Chavkin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lisa Romero Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benjamin Vaughan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Renee Schwalberg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marie Klingberg‐Allvin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel Thompson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angela Nannini Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tina Raine
Rankless by CCL
2026