Nancy Lim
Impact in
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
-
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Papers in
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 8
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 4
- Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior 2
-
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 5
- Co-authors
- David E. Clapham (2 shared papers)Nathan Dascal (3 shared papers)Karen E. Hedin (1 shared paper)Martha C. Nowycky (2 shared papers)Richard J. Bookman (2 shared papers)Cesar Labarca (2 shared papers)Wolfgang Schreibmayer (2 shared papers)Henry A. Lester (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)The Journal of General Physiology (2 papers)Nature (1 paper)Neuron (1 paper)Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nancy Lim
9 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 558
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 353
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Cell Biology 92
- Sensory Systems 24
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Lim
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Lim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Lim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Lim. The network helps show where Nancy Lim may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 318 | |
| 2 | 2002 | 195 | |
| 3 | 1996 | 157 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 142 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 91 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 81 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 77 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 14 |
About Nancy Lim
Nancy Lim is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Ecology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper), Cellular transport and secretion (1 paper) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (558 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (353 citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations), Cell Biology (92 citations) and Sensory Systems (24 citations). Nancy Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David E. Clapham, Nathan Dascal, Karen E. Hedin, Martha C. Nowycky, Richard J. Bookman, Cesar Labarca, Wolfgang Schreibmayer, Henry A. Lester, Claire Gavériaux‐Ruff and David Trollinger. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of General Physiology, Nature, Neuron and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.