James C. Smith
- Molecular Biology top 0.05%
- Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation 136
- Congenital heart defects research 74
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 40
- TGF-β signaling in diseases 32
- Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics 25
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 23
- Biochemistry top 0.1%
- Cell Biology top 0.1%
- Aging top 0.5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 0.1%
- Trace Elements in Health 35
-
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction 25
- Co-authors
- Jeremy GreenMasazumi TadaDanny HuylebroeckJudith S EisenL. DaleVincent T. CunliffeJames T. MarshKaren Symes
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomTanzania
In The Last Decade
James C. Smith
462 papers receiving 27.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
- Molecular Biology 19.2k
- Biochemistry 1.5k
- Cell Biology 3.4k
- Aging 352
- Nutrition and Dietetics 2.6k
Countries citing papers authored by James C. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Smith. The network helps show where James C. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 49 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 87 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 79 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 167 | |
| 12 | Aboriginal voters in the Burragorang Valley, NSW, 1869-1953 | 2012 | 3 |
| 13 | The petroglyphs of Gundungurra country | 2011 | 1 |
| 14 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2005 | 44 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 110 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 43 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 55 | |
| 20 | 1968 | 2 |
About James C. Smith
James C. Smith is a scholar working on Aging, Sensory Systems and Molecular Biology, having authored 474 papers that have together received 28.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (136 papers), Congenital heart defects research (74 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (40 papers), Trace Elements in Health (35 papers), TGF-β signaling in diseases (32 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (25 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (25 papers) and Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (19.2k citations), Biochemistry (1.5k citations) and Cell Biology (3.4k citations). James C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Green, Masazumi Tada, Danny Huylebroeck, Judith S Eisen, L. Dale, Vincent T. Cunliffe, James T. Marsh, Karen Symes, Jonathan Slack and Frank L. Conlon. Their work appears in journals such as Development, Developmental Biology, Physiology & Behavior, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Journal of Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.