James C. Smith

35.9k total citations · 4 hit papers
474 papers, 28.3k citations indexed

About

James C. Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, James C. Smith has authored 474 papers receiving a total of 28.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 253 papers in Molecular Biology, 54 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 46 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in James C. Smith's work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (136 papers), Congenital heart defects research (74 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (40 papers). James C. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (136 papers), Congenital heart defects research (74 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (40 papers). James C. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Tanzania. James C. Smith's co-authors include Jeremy Green, Masazumi Tada, Danny Huylebroeck, Judith S Eisen, L. Dale, Vincent T. Cunliffe, James T. Marsh, Karen Symes, Jonathan Slack and Frank L. Conlon and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.

In The Last Decade

James C. Smith

462 papers receiving 27.0k citations

Hit Papers

Expression of a xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an im... 1990 2026 2002 2014 1991 2000 2000 1990 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James C. Smith United States 92 19.2k 3.5k 3.4k 2.6k 1.7k 474 28.3k
Paul W. Sternberg United States 97 13.9k 0.7× 2.6k 0.7× 1.9k 0.5× 693 0.3× 2.3k 1.4× 579 33.1k
Douglas C. Wallace United States 115 39.2k 2.0× 8.1k 2.3× 1.5k 0.5× 1.5k 0.6× 3.2k 1.9× 381 54.1k
Morris J. Karnovsky United States 88 16.9k 0.9× 2.5k 0.7× 5.6k 1.6× 1.5k 0.6× 4.9k 2.9× 224 40.0k
John W. Eaton United States 80 8.9k 0.5× 978 0.3× 2.4k 0.7× 2.0k 0.8× 818 0.5× 271 24.3k
Florian Läng Germany 113 36.0k 1.9× 4.0k 1.1× 5.4k 1.6× 3.9k 1.5× 6.7k 4.0× 1.4k 68.2k
Piotr Chomczyński United States 25 26.5k 1.4× 6.1k 1.7× 3.8k 1.1× 2.1k 0.8× 4.7k 2.8× 54 51.9k
Linda Partridge United Kingdom 115 20.7k 1.1× 10.8k 3.1× 2.6k 0.7× 946 0.4× 9.4k 5.6× 575 63.5k
Michael Dean United States 87 18.0k 0.9× 4.2k 1.2× 1.4k 0.4× 1.7k 0.7× 3.0k 1.8× 385 41.2k
Nicoletta Sacchi Italy 34 26.0k 1.4× 6.0k 1.7× 3.6k 1.1× 1.8k 0.7× 4.6k 2.7× 150 50.8k
Li Zhang China 105 28.5k 1.5× 4.4k 1.2× 2.8k 0.8× 1.5k 0.6× 5.6k 3.3× 1.9k 60.1k

Countries citing papers authored by James C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James C. Smith. The network helps show where James C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James C. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James C. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James C. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James C. Smith. James C. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Cummins, Timothy D., Kevin Z. L. Wu, Polyxeni Bozatzi, et al.. (2018). PAWS1 controls cytoskeletal dynamics and cell migration through association with the SH3 adaptor CD2AP. Journal of Cell Science. 131(1). 49 indexed citations
3.
Fulcher, Luke J., Polyxeni Bozatzi, Kevin Z. L. Wu, et al.. (2018). The DUF1669 domain of FAM83 family proteins anchor casein kinase 1 isoforms. Science Signaling. 11(531). 87 indexed citations
4.
Place, Elsie & James C. Smith. (2017). Zebrafish atoh8 mutants do not recapitulate morpholino phenotypes. PLoS ONE. 12(2). e0171143–e0171143. 13 indexed citations
5.
Collart, Clara, Nick Owens, Leena Bhaw, et al.. (2014). High-resolution analysis of gene activity during the Xenopus mid-blastula transition. Development. 141(9). 1927–1939. 79 indexed citations
6.
Collart, Clara, George E. Allen, Charles R. Bradshaw, James C. Smith, & Philip Zegerman. (2013). Titration of Four Replication Factors Is Essential for the Xenopus laevis Midblastula Transition. Science. 341(6148). 893–896. 167 indexed citations
7.
Smith, James C., et al.. (2011). The petroglyphs of Gundungurra country. 28(2). 241–249. 1 indexed citations
8.
Cason, Angie M., Bumsup Kwon, James C. Smith, & Thomas A. Houpt. (2010). c-Fos induction by a 14T magnetic field in visceral and vestibular relays of the female rat brainstem is modulated by estradiol. Brain Research. 1347. 48–57. 9 indexed citations
9.
Hagemann, Anja I.H., et al.. (2009). Rab5-mediated endocytosis of activin is not required for gene activation or long-range signalling in Xenopus. Development. 136(16). 2803–2813. 16 indexed citations
10.
Karl, Thomas, A. Turnipseed, Roy L. Mauldin, et al.. (2008). New particle formation in the Front Range of the Colorado Rocky Mountains. Atmospheric chemistry and physics. 8(6). 1577–1590. 64 indexed citations
11.
Smith, James C. & Wolfgang Maret. (2008). Walter Mertz (1923–2002). Journal of Nutrition. 138(2). 247–249. 1 indexed citations
12.
Dingwell, Kevin S. & James C. Smith. (2006). Tes regulates neural crest migration and axial elongation in Xenopus. Developmental Biology. 293(1). 252–267. 5 indexed citations
13.
Brown, Daniel D., et al.. (2005). Tbx5 and Tbx20 act synergistically to control vertebrate heart morphogenesis. Development. 132(3). 553–563. 110 indexed citations
14.
Birsoy, Bilge, Linnea Berg, Phoebe Williams, et al.. (2005). XPACE4 is a localized pro-protein convertase required for mesoderm induction and the cleavage of specific TGFβ proteins in Xenopus development. Development. 132(3). 591–602. 44 indexed citations
15.
Rana, Amer A., Juan Pedro Martı́nez-Barberá, Tristan A. Rodríguez, et al.. (2004). Targeted deletion of the novel cytoplasmic dynein mD2LIC disrupts the embryonic organiser, formation of the body axes and specification of ventral cell fates. Development. 131(20). 4999–5007. 55 indexed citations
16.
Wardle, Fiona C. & James C. Smith. (2004). Refinement of gene expression patterns in the early Xenopus embryo. Development. 131(19). 4687–4696. 43 indexed citations
17.
Domingos, Pedro, Nobue Itasaki, C. Michael Jones, et al.. (2001). The Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway Posteriorizes Neural Tissue in Xenopus by an Indirect Mechanism Requiring FGF Signalling. Developmental Biology. 239(1). 148–160. 97 indexed citations
18.
Jones, C. Michael & James C. Smith. (1995). Inductive Signals: Revolving vertebrates. Current Biology. 5(6). 574–576. 22 indexed citations
19.
Cheok, Ka C., et al.. (1989). Neurocontrol of auto-lock-on target-tracking sight control system. 17(2). 32–36. 1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, James C. & Marian E. Swendseid. (1988). James A. Halsted. Journal of Nutrition. 118(4). 421–424. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026