Nancy L. Booth

11 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers

Nancy L. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Biochemistry 133
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 374
  • Pharmacology 97
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 88
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 154
Replace Jianghua Liu with:
Jianghua Liu China
Wichai Cherdshewasart Thailand
Wing Ping Fong Hong Kong
Chaiyo Chaichantipyuth Thailand
Xiaoli Peng China
Kenneth Jones United States
Paiboon Nuntanakorn United States
Tomoki Hirakawa Japan
M. R. Vijayababu India
Mihir Parikh Canada
Nancy L. Booth relative to Jianghua Liu China Jianghua Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jianghua Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy L. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy L. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy L. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy L. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy L. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy L. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy L. Booth. The network helps show where Nancy L. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nancy L. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy L. Booth Line = papers co-authored together Nancy L. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2001332
2 2006100
3 200682
4 200672
5 200267
6 200834
7 200415
8 200713
9 201113
10 20129
11
Red clover (Trifolium pratense) as a botanical dietary supplement.
20051

About Nancy L. Booth

Nancy L. Booth is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 11 papers that have together received 738 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoestrogen effects and research (6 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (4 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (2 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers), Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (1 paper), Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (1 paper) and Health, Medicine and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (133 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (374 citations), Pharmacology (97 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (88 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (154 citations). Nancy L. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Norman R. Farnsworth, Judy L. Bolton, Richard B. van Breemen, Joanna E. Burdette, Krishna Bhat, Andreas I. Constantinou, John M. Pezzuto, Jianghua Liu, Haiyan Xu and Chungang Gu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and APOPTOSIS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact