Nancy Heiser

590 citations
6 papers · 387 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Nancy Heiser

6 papers receiving 352 citations

Peers

Nancy Heiser
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 188
  • Clinical Psychology 209
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 92
  • Medical Terminology 1
  • Social Psychology 70
Replace L. A. Champion with:
L. A. Champion United Kingdom
Karen Heffernan United States
Valarie M. Schroeder United States
Marija Dunn United States
Lydia Jackson United States
Angela Dixon Australia
Jallu Lindblom Finland
Xavier Méndez Spain
Jeffrey P. Burk United States
Casey L. Blalock United States
Nancy Heiser relative to L. A. Champion United Kingdom L. A. Champion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
L. A. Champion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Heiser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Heiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Heiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Heiser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Heiser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Heiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Heiser. The network helps show where Nancy Heiser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Heiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nancy Heiser Line = papers co-authored together Nancy Heiser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Nancy Heiser

Nancy Heiser is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (1 paper), Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (188 citations), Clinical Psychology (209 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (92 citations), Medical Terminology (1 citation) and Social Psychology (70 citations). Nancy Heiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Déborah C. Beidel, Samuel M. Turner, Embry Howell, Mary E. Harrington, Roxann Roberson‐Nay, Mike Johnson, R. Bruce Lydiard and Robert F. St. Peter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Journal of Drug Issues, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Psychological Assessment and Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact