Mary E. Harrington

4.8k citations
101 papers · 3.9k indexed · h-index 33

Impact in

Papers in

Mary E. Harrington

99 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Mary E. Harrington
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 3.0k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.9k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Aging 122
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 120
Replace Stephan Michel with:
Stephan Michel Netherlands
Michael C. Antle Canada
Alan M. Rosenwasser United States
Helena Illnerová Czechia
Alec J. Davidson United States
Joke Wortel Netherlands
Kazuyuki Shinohara Japan
Bruce F. O’Hara United States
Stuart M. Armstrong Australia
Tara A. LeGates United States
Mary E. Harrington relative to Stephan Michel Netherlands Stephan Michel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Stephan Michel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Harrington

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Harrington's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Harrington with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Harrington more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Harrington

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Harrington. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Harrington. The network helps show where Mary E. Harrington may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mary E. Harrington, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mary E. Harrington Line = papers co-authored together Mary E. Harrington links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20246
2 20227
3 20218
4 202125
5 202018
6
CHIPRA Mandated Evaluation of the Children's Health Insurance Program: Final Findings
201412
7 201026
8 200927
9 200817
10 200624
11 200493
12 20027
13 19998
14
Handling unexpected storm debris
19971
15 199325
16 19921
17 199160
18 199140
19 198959
20 1989150

About Mary E. Harrington

Mary E. Harrington is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Aging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 101 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (73 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (36 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (16 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (16 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (14 papers), Dietary Effects on Health (11 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (7 papers) and Light effects on plants (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (3.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.9k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Aging (122 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (120 citations). Mary E. Harrington has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Rusak, Paola C. Yannielli, Stephany M. Biello, Diego A. Golombék, Dwight M. Nance, Penny C. Molyneux, Tanya Leise, Johanna H. Meijer, Kathryn M. Schak and Robert J. Mason. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Journal of Biological Rhythms, Neuroscience, European Journal of Neuroscience and Neuroreport.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026