Nancy Guild
Impact in
- Media Technology top 2%
- Experimental Learning in Engineering
- Education top 1%
- Innovative Teaching Methods
- Online and Blended Learning
Papers in
-
- Innovative Teaching Methods 4
- Education and Critical Thinking Development 3
- Science Education and Pedagogy 2
- Online and Blended Learning 1
-
- RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 3
- Co-authors
- Jenny Knight (4 shared papers)Wendy K. Adams (2 shared papers)Michelle K. Smith (2 shared papers)Tin Tin Su (2 shared papers)Carl Wieman (2 shared papers)W. Barry Wood (1 shared paper)Margit Gayle (2 shared papers)Olke C. Uhlenbeck (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)CBE—Life Sciences Education (1 paper)Developmental Biology (1 paper)Science (1 paper)Journal of Molecular Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaFrance
In The Last Decade
Nancy Guild
8 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Nancy Guild's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Media Technology 202
- Education 654
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 217
- Computer Science Applications 77
- Architecture 14
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Guild
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Guild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Guild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Guild more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Guild
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Guild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Guild. The network helps show where Nancy Guild may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Guild, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions Hit paper breakdown → | 2009 | 667 |
| 2 | 1988 | 292 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 103 | |
| 4 | 1988 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 53 | |
| 6 | 1988 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 8 | [A new early gene in front of the middle gene 31 of bacteriophage T4: cloning and expression]. | 1989 | 5 |
About Nancy Guild
Nancy Guild is a scholar working on Education, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Media Technology and Genetics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (3 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (2 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (1 paper), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (202 citations), Education (654 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (217 citations), Computer Science Applications (77 citations) and Architecture (14 citations). Nancy Guild has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Jenny Knight, Wendy K. Adams, Michelle K. Smith, Tin Tin Su, Carl Wieman, W. Barry Wood, Margit Gayle, Olke C. Uhlenbeck, Yves d’Aubenton-Carafa and Peter Gauss. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, CBE—Life Sciences Education, Developmental Biology, Science and Journal of Molecular Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.