Nancy Guild

2.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Nancy Guild is a scholar working on Education, Molecular Biology and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nancy Guild has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Education, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Nancy Guild's work include Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers). Nancy Guild is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching Methods (4 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (3 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers). Nancy Guild collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Nancy Guild's co-authors include Jenny Knight, Wendy K. Adams, Tin Tin Su, Carl Wieman, Michelle K. Smith, W. Barry Wood, Margit Gayle, Claude Thermes, Gary D. Stormo and I Tinoco and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Molecular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Nancy Guild

8 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions

2009 661 citations Michelle K. Smith, W. Barry Wood et al. Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nancy Guild United States	6	656	453	219	201	160	8	1.3k
Alison J. Crowe United States	19	877 1.3×	441 1.0×	325 1.5×	128 0.6×	17 0.1×	30	1.8k
Clarissa Dirks United States	10	848 1.3×	114 0.3×	241 1.1×	150 0.7×	22 0.1×	12	1.2k
Mar Carrió Spain	21	280 0.4×	1.1k 2.4×	72 0.3×	18 0.1×	150 0.9×	43	1.7k
Andrew G. Campbell United States	11	353 0.5×	306 0.7×	89 0.4×	44 0.2×	14 0.1×	21	1.2k
Nancy Pelaez United States	17	855 1.3×	217 0.5×	239 1.1×	123 0.6×	18 0.1×	46	1.5k
Nancy J. Nelson United States	18	250 0.4×	229 0.5×	232 1.1×	36 0.2×	16 0.1×	97	1.5k
Jay B. Labov United States	13	428 0.7×	105 0.2×	76 0.3×	101 0.5×	20 0.1×	31	681
Christine Pfund United States	24	682 1.0×	714 1.6×	106 0.5×	83 0.4×	30 0.2×	51	2.6k
Sarah Miller United States	10	895 1.4×	139 0.3×	229 1.0×	205 1.0×	11 0.1×	14	1.4k
Jane E. Caldwell United States	8	800 1.2×	255 0.6×	132 0.6×	361 1.8×	4 0.0×	9	1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Guild

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Guild's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Guild with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Guild more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Guild

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Guild. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Guild. The network helps show where Nancy Guild may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy Guild

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy Guild. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy Guild based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy Guild. Nancy Guild is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Knight, Jenny, et al.. (2017). Using Pre-Assessment and In-Class Questions to Change Student Understanding of Molecular Movements. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education. 18(1). 4 indexed citations

2.

Wood, William B., et al.. (2010). A Diagnostic Assessment for Introductory Molecular and Cell Biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 9(4). 453–461. 102 indexed citations

3.

Smith, Michelle K., William B. Wood, Wendy K. Adams, et al.. (2009). Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Developmental Biology. 331(2). 416–416. 53 indexed citations

4.

Smith, Michelle K., W. Barry Wood, Wendy K. Adams, et al.. (2009). Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions. Science. 323(5910). 122–124. 661 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Guild, Nancy, et al.. (1989). [A new early gene in front of the middle gene 31 of bacteriophage T4: cloning and expression].. PubMed. 23(3). 739–49. 5 indexed citations

6.

Guild, Nancy, et al.. (1988). Transcriptional activation of bacteriophage T4 middle promoters by the motA protein. Journal of Molecular Biology. 199(2). 241–258. 81 indexed citations

7.

Gauss, Peter, Claude Thermes, Duncan R. Groebe, et al.. (1988). CUUCGG hairpins: extraordinarily stable RNA secondary structures associated with various biochemical processes.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 85(5). 1364–1368. 292 indexed citations

8.

Andrake, Mark, et al.. (1988). DNA polymerase of bacteriophage T4 is an autogenous translational repressor.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 85(21). 7942–7946. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact