Nadine Hempel
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 2%
- Oncology top 5%
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mohamed TrebakJ. Andrés MelendezMichael E. McManusNiranjali GamageJennifer L. MartinGerard C. BlobeAmanda C. BarnettKelly Windmill
- Topics
- Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (13 papers)Ion Channels and Receptors (11 papers)Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (10 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical Investigation
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Nadine Hempel
71 papers receiving 3.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Molecular Biology 2.2k
- Cancer Research 652
- Oncology 526
- Sensory Systems 406
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 305
Countries citing papers authored by Nadine Hempel
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadine Hempel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadine Hempel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadine Hempel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadine Hempel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadine Hempel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadine Hempel. The network helps show where Nadine Hempel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadine Hempel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadine Hempel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadine Hempel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadine Hempel. Nadine Hempel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 76 | |
| 7 | 70 | |
| 8 | 90 | |
| 9 | 95 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 143 | |
| 18 | 96 | |
| 19 | 145 | |
| 20 | 109 |
About Nadine Hempel
Nadine Hempel is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, having authored 72 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (13 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (11 papers) and Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (406 citations), Cancer Research (652 citations) and Molecular Biology (2.2k citations). Nadine Hempel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Mohamed Trebak, J. Andrés Melendez, Michael E. McManus, Niranjali Gamage, Jennifer L. Martin, Gerard C. Blobe, Amanda C. Barnett, Kelly Windmill, Ronald G. Duggleby and Rébécca Phaëton. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.