Assaf Elazar

587 total citations
8 papers, 371 citations indexed

About

Assaf Elazar is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Assaf Elazar has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 371 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Genetics and 1 paper in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Assaf Elazar's work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers). Assaf Elazar is often cited by papers focused on Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (4 papers) and Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (3 papers). Assaf Elazar collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and Australia. Assaf Elazar's co-authors include Jonathan J. Weinstein, Sarel J. Fleishman, Drew C. Tilley, Brian D. Weitzner, Julia Koehler Leman, Rebecca F. Alford, Amanda M. Duran, Jeffrey J. Gray, Jaime Prilusky and Eitan Bibi and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The EMBO Journal and eLife.

In The Last Decade

Assaf Elazar

8 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Assaf Elazar Israel	8	283	46	38	32	30	8	371
Ximin Chi China	9	287 1.0×	57 1.2×	61 1.6×	46 1.4×	27 0.9×	14	429
Peter Stohler Switzerland	6	359 1.3×	70 1.5×	25 0.7×	36 1.1×	25 0.8×	7	447
Sanling Liu China	11	278 1.0×	59 1.3×	23 0.6×	25 0.8×	18 0.6×	18	364
Tat Cheung Cheng United States	9	301 1.1×	66 1.4×	47 1.2×	32 1.0×	37 1.2×	10	462
Joshua Holcomb United States	11	296 1.0×	56 1.2×	26 0.7×	37 1.2×	29 1.0×	22	481
Benjamin K. Mueller United States	8	361 1.3×	43 0.9×	18 0.5×	19 0.6×	39 1.3×	12	443
Alla Korepanova United States	8	180 0.6×	29 0.6×	40 1.1×	12 0.4×	10 0.3×	14	263
Masahiro Hiraizumi Japan	7	276 1.0×	18 0.4×	51 1.3×	27 0.8×	34 1.1×	11	380
Anna Caroline E. Dahl United Kingdom	4	311 1.1×	30 0.7×	32 0.8×	19 0.6×	31 1.0×	4	364
You Zhuo United States	11	238 0.8×	76 1.7×	10 0.3×	13 0.4×	45 1.5×	18	340

Countries citing papers authored by Assaf Elazar

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Assaf Elazar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assaf Elazar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assaf Elazar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Assaf Elazar

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Assaf Elazar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Assaf Elazar. The network helps show where Assaf Elazar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Assaf Elazar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Assaf Elazar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Assaf Elazar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Assaf Elazar. Assaf Elazar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Elazar, Assaf, et al.. (2023). Computational design of BclxL inhibitors that target transmembrane domain interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(11). e2219648120–e2219648120. 7 indexed citations

2.

Elazar, Assaf, Jonathan J. Weinstein, Raphael Trenker, et al.. (2022). De novo-designed transmembrane domains tune engineered receptor functions. eLife. 11. 34 indexed citations

3.

Noda‐García, Lianet, Dan Davidi, Elisa Korenblum, et al.. (2019). Chance and pleiotropy dominate genetic diversity in complex bacterial environments. Nature Microbiology. 4(7). 1221–1230. 16 indexed citations

4.

Weinstein, Jonathan J., Assaf Elazar, & Sarel J. Fleishman. (2019). A lipophilicity-based energy function for membrane-protein modelling and design. PLoS Computational Biology. 15(8). e1007318–e1007318. 27 indexed citations

5.

Zhang, Xuexin, Assaf Elazar, Soumitra Roy, et al.. (2017). Mitochondria control store‐operated Ca ²⁺ entry through Na ⁺ and redox signals. The EMBO Journal. 36(6). 797–815. 84 indexed citations

6.

Elazar, Assaf, Jonathan J. Weinstein, Jaime Prilusky, & Sarel J. Fleishman. (2016). Interplay between hydrophobicity and the positive-inside rule in determining membrane-protein topology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(37). 10340–10345. 37 indexed citations

7.

Elazar, Assaf, et al.. (2016). Mutational scanning reveals the determinants of protein insertion and association energetics in the plasma membrane. eLife. 5. 55 indexed citations

8.

Alford, Rebecca F., Julia Koehler Leman, Brian D. Weitzner, et al.. (2015). An Integrated Framework Advancing Membrane Protein Modeling and Design. PLoS Computational Biology. 11(9). e1004398–e1004398. 111 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact