Nadia J. Chaves
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Epidemiology
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Leanne SakzewskiIvan LinStacey JankelowitzShelley A. WilkinsonAndrea P. MarshallSusie ThomasClement T. LoyGwyneth Rees
- Topics
- Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers)Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers)Travel-related health issues (1 paper)
- Journals
- Emerging infectious diseasesThe Medical Journal of AustraliaThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Nadia J. Chaves
11 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- General Health Professions 125
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 87
- Clinical Psychology 48
- Epidemiology 48
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia J. Chaves
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia J. Chaves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia J. Chaves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia J. Chaves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia J. Chaves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia J. Chaves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia J. Chaves. The network helps show where Nadia J. Chaves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia J. Chaves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia J. Chaves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia J. Chaves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia J. Chaves. Nadia J. Chaves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 43 | |
| 5 | 169 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 3 |
About Nadia J. Chaves
Nadia J. Chaves is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Emergency Medical Services and Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Use and Resistance (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers) and Travel-related health issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (38 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (28 citations) and General Health Professions (125 citations). Nadia J. Chaves has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Leanne Sakzewski, Ivan Lin, Stacey Jankelowitz, Shelley A. Wilkinson, Andrea P. Marshall, Susie Thomas, Clement T. Loy, Gwyneth Rees, Cameron Phillips and Susan Michie. Their work appears in journals such as Emerging infectious diseases, The Medical Journal of Australia and The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.