Nadia Barrett
Impact in
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Papers in
-
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder 9
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 4
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 4
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 1
- Co-authors
- Katya Rubia (9 shared papers)Vincent Giampietro (9 shared papers)Andrew Simmons (8 shared papers)Michael Brammer (6 shared papers)Anna Smith (4 shared papers)Ana Cubillo (4 shared papers)Kaylita Chantiluke (3 shared papers)Declan Murphy (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychological Medicine (2 papers)Biological Psychiatry (2 papers)Cerebral Cortex (2 papers)Current Opinion in Psychiatry (1 paper)Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerlandFrance
In The Last Decade
Nadia Barrett
11 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Psychiatry and Mental health 251
- Cognitive Neuroscience 180
- Neurology 15
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 18
- Clinical Psychology 26
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Barrett
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Barrett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Barrett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Barrett. The network helps show where Nadia Barrett may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Barrett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 100 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 46 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 10 | Developing an Immunoassay for the anabolic steroid stanazolol | 1995 | 2 |
| 11 | 2020 | 2 |
About Nadia Barrett
Nadia Barrett is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (9 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (1 paper) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (251 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (180 citations), Neurology (15 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (18 citations) and Clinical Psychology (26 citations). Nadia Barrett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and France. Frequent co-authors include Katya Rubia, Vincent Giampietro, Andrew Simmons, Michael Brammer, Anna Smith, Ana Cubillo, Kaylita Chantiluke, Declan Murphy, Paramala Santosh and Mick Brammer. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Medicine, Biological Psychiatry, Cerebral Cortex, Current Opinion in Psychiatry and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.