Nadia Barrett

14 total papers · 466 total citations
11 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Nadia Barrett is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nadia Barrett has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 1 paper in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Nadia Barrett's work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers). Nadia Barrett is often cited by papers focused on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers). Nadia Barrett collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Switzerland. Nadia Barrett's co-authors include Andrew Simmons, Katya Rubia, Vincent Giampietro, Michael Brammer, Ana Cubillo, Anna Smith, Kaylita Chantiluke, Declan Murphy, Mick Brammer and Michael J. Brammer and has published in prestigious journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Cerebral Cortex.

In The Last Decade

Nadia Barrett

11 papers receiving 325 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Nadia Barrett 262 256 47 31 23 11 336
Russell Hanford 263 1.0× 235 0.9× 41 0.9× 28 0.9× 37 1.6× 8 345
Linda Gonzalez 230 0.9× 163 0.6× 29 0.6× 59 1.9× 35 1.5× 18 343
Hazel McCarthy 223 0.9× 267 1.0× 70 1.5× 17 0.5× 14 0.6× 10 390
Thomas Villemonteix 259 1.0× 240 0.9× 46 1.0× 44 1.4× 16 0.7× 25 339
Stuart Leask 139 0.5× 161 0.6× 49 1.0× 37 1.2× 10 0.4× 15 323
Sara Ambrosino 110 0.4× 224 0.9× 52 1.1× 20 0.6× 31 1.3× 9 361
Suzanne M. Shdo 211 0.8× 197 0.8× 43 0.9× 18 0.6× 16 0.7× 20 380
Sílvia Zaragoza Domingo 118 0.5× 96 0.4× 44 0.9× 28 0.9× 11 0.5× 16 308
Tatiana Aboulafia-Brakha 139 0.5× 97 0.4× 63 1.3× 27 0.9× 14 0.6× 11 367
Marcy Adler 187 0.7× 259 1.0× 38 0.8× 62 2.0× 36 1.6× 6 372

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Barrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Barrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Barrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Barrett. The network helps show where Nadia Barrett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Barrett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Barrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Barrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Barrett. Nadia Barrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026