Nadia Barberis
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Sebastiano CostaFrancesca CuzzocreaMaria Cristina GugliandoloValeria VerrastroRosalba LarcanMaria C. QuattropaniFrancesca LigaMark D. Griffiths
- Topics
- Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (10 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNutrientsJournal of Affective Disorders
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Nadia Barberis
47 papers receiving 549 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Clinical Psychology 316
- Social Psychology 177
- Sociology and Political Science 144
- Psychiatry and Mental health 73
- Applied Psychology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Barberis
This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Barberis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Barberis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Barberis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Barberis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Barberis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Barberis. The network helps show where Nadia Barberis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nadia Barberis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nadia Barberis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nadia Barberis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nadia Barberis. Nadia Barberis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 23 |
About Nadia Barberis
Nadia Barberis is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 569 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (10 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (316 citations), Applied Psychology (60 citations) and Social Psychology (177 citations). Nadia Barberis has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Sebastiano Costa, Francesca Cuzzocrea, Maria Cristina Gugliandolo, Valeria Verrastro, Rosalba Larcan, Maria C. Quattropani, Francesca Liga, Mark D. Griffiths, Lara Gitto and Domenico Santoro. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nutrients and Journal of Affective Disorders.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.