Nadia Allamano

651 citations
8 papers · 462 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Nadia Allamano

7 papers receiving 438 citations

Peers

Nadia Allamano
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 292
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 130
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 117
  • Statistics and Probability 53
  • Human-Computer Interaction 30
Replace Jean McConnell with:
Jean McConnell United Kingdom
Angela Hayden United States
Filomena Anelli Italy
Joan Stiles-Davis United States
Bonnie M. Lawrence United States
George Jewell United States
Amy M. Clements-Stephens United States
Katrina Ferrara United States
Fern Jaspers‐Fayer Canada
Nadine Diersch Germany
Nadia Allamano relative to Jean McConnell United Kingdom Jean McConnell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jean McConnell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Allamano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Allamano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Allamano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Allamano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Allamano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Allamano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Allamano. The network helps show where Nadia Allamano may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Allamano, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Allamano Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Allamano links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1999407
2 200622
3 200515
4
Un test per la diagnosi dei deficit di scrittura: principi di costruzione e dati normativi
199410
5 19965
6 20182
7
Span di memoria visiva a breve termine: dati preliminari
19941
8 20100

About Nadia Allamano

Nadia Allamano is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Automotive Engineering, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 8 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (5 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (1 paper), Text Readability and Simplification (1 paper), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper), Language Development and Disorders (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (292 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (130 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (117 citations), Statistics and Probability (53 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (30 citations). Nadia Allamano has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lindsay Wilson, Alan Baddeley, C. H. GRAY, Marcella Laiacona, Erminio Capitani, Claudio Luzzatti, Carlo Semenza, Sara Mondini, Antonio De Tanti and Sergio Della Sala. Their work appears in journals such as Brain and Language, Neuropsychologia, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, Neuropsychology and Neurocase.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact